ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2021
When randomisation is not good enough: Matching groups in intervention studies.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05292807 (Imagery Rescripting and Imaginal Exposure for Anxiety Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Imagery Rescripting and Imaginal Exposure for Anxiety Symptoms: Mechanisms and Outcomes in a Large Analog Sample
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility, safety and efficacy of multi-dose vagus nerve stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomised sham-controlled proof-of-concept study.Journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- Transcranial random noise stimulation combined with cognitive training for treating ADHD: a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.Translational psychiatry · 2023Trial
- A clinical trial of cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric comorbidity and quality of life with Cancer Patients during Chemotherapy (CPdC).BMC psychiatry · 2022Trial
- Imaging mass cytometry reveals functional and immunological changes during type 1 diabetes progression in human pancreata.Nature metabolism · 2026Article
- Histamine shapes the neurocomputational dynamics of human learning.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A coparent intervention to prevent prenatal stress and depression symptoms in families with lower incomes.Family relations · 2026Article
- Article
- The Effects of Varying Intensities of Unilateral Handgrip Fatigue on Bilateral Movement.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Strategies to boost statistical efficiency in randomized oncology trials with primary time-to-event endpoints.Statistical methods in medical research · 2025Article
- Study protocol for a multi-session randomized sham-controlled trial of PCC- and amygdala-targeted neurofeedback for the treatment of PTSD.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Preemptive transcranial direct current stimulation mitigates susceptibility to persistent pain.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Dose-response of tDCS effects on motor learning and cortical excitability: A preregistered study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Self-management interventions for gestational diabetes in Africa: a scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Article
- Contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis: Should it impact management of pancreatitis?Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Article
- Human neuronal excitation/inhibition balance explains and predicts neurostimulation induced learning benefits.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Safety and tolerability of adjunct non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation in people with parkinson's: a study protocol.BMC neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Randomised assignment of individuals to treatment and controls groups is often considered the gold standard to draw valid conclusions about the efficacy of an intervention. In practice, randomisation can lead to accidental differences due to chance. Researchers have offered alternatives to reduce such differences, but these methods are not used frequently due to the requirement of advanced statistical methods. Here, we recommend a simple assignment procedure based on variance minimisation (VM), which assigns incoming participants automatically to the condition that minimises differences between groups in relevant measures. As an example of its application in the research context, we simulated an intervention study whereby a researcher used the VM procedure on a covariate to assign participants to a control and intervention group rather than controlling for the covariate at the analysis stage. Among other features of the simulated study, such as effect size and sample size, we manipulated the correlation between the matching covariate and the outcome variable and the presence of imbalance between groups in the covariate. Our results highlighted the advantages of VM over prevalent random assignment procedure in terms of reducing the Type I error rate and providing accurate estimates of the effect of the group on the outcome variable. The VM procedure is valuable in situations whereby the intervention to an individual begins before the recruitment of the entire sample size is completed. We provide an Excel spreadsheet, as well as scripts in R, MATLAB, and Python to ease and foster the implementation of the VM procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.