SynthesisAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2021
First world consensus conference on pancreas transplantation: Part I-Methods and results of literature search.
Synthesis in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation Versus Kidney Transplantation Alone in Type 1 Diabetes: Does Pancreas Transplantation Improve Clinical Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- First world consensus conference on pancreas transplantation: Part I-Methods and results of literature search.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021Pooled it
- Molecular diagnostics in pancreas transplantation: past, present, and future.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Is 2 h of Hypothermic Machine Perfusion for Pancreas Preservation Effective in Improving Graft Reperfusion?Transplantation direct · 2025Article
- Short-term outcome after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation with alemtuzumab vs. basiliximab induction: a single-center retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing the Predictive Power of PIRCHE-II Scores for the Development ofTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024Article
- Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Invasive Fungal Infections in Pancreas Transplant in the Absence of Postoperative Antifungal Prophylaxis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Comparison of Outcomes and Survival of Two Cohorts of Patients with Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Latin American Hospital.BioMed research international · 2023Observational
- Every islet matters: improving the impact of human islet research.Nature metabolism · 2022Review
- First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for the practice of pancreas transplantation are yet to be established. The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation was convened for this purpose. A steering committee selected the participants and defined the questions to be addressed. A group of literature reviewers identified 597 studies to be included in summaries for guidelines production. Expert groups formulated the first draft of recommendations. Two rounds of discussion and voting occurred online, using the Delphi method (agreement rate ≥85%). After each round, critical responses of experts were reviewed, and recommendations were amended accordingly. Recommendations were finalized after live discussions. Each session was preceded by expert presentations and a summary of results of systematic literature review. Up to three voting rounds were allowed for each recommendation. To avoid potential conflicts of interest, deliberations on issues regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the management of diabetes were conducted by an independent jury. Recommendations on technical issues were determined by experts and validated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology. Each recommendation received a GRADE rating (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.