Evidence mapPaperPMID 34255166Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022

External validation of predictive scores for diabetes remission after metabolic surgery.

Izabela A Karpińska, Joanna Choma, Michał Wysocki, Alicja Dudek, Piotr Małczak, Magdalena Szopa, Michał Pędziwiatr, Piotr Major

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Towards precision medicine in bariatric surgery prescription.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Izabela A Karpińska2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Kraków, Poland.
Joanna Choma2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Kraków, Poland.
Michał WysockiDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital in Cracow, Kraków, Poland.
Alicja Dudek2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Kraków, Poland.
Piotr Małczak2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Kraków, Poland.
Magdalena SzopaKraków University Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Michał Pędziwiatr2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Kraków, Poland.
Piotr Major2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Kraków, Poland. piotr.major@uj.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6552-7979
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBariatric surgery has proven to be the most efficient treatment for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Despite detailed qualification, desirable outcome after an intervention is not achieved by every patient. Various risk prediction models of diabetes remission after metabolic surgery have been established to facilitate the decision-making process. The purpose of the study is to validate the performance of available risk prediction scores for diabetes remission a year after surgical treatment and to determine the optimal model.

methodsA retrospective analysis comprised 252 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) between 2009 and 2017 and completed 1-year follow-up. The literature review revealed 5 models, which were subsequently explored in our study. Each score relationship with diabetes remission was assessed using logistic regression. Discrimination was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, whereas calibration by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and predicted versus observed remission ratio.

resultsOne year after surgery, 68.7% partial and 21.8% complete diabetes remission and 53.4% excessive weight loss were observed. DiaBetter demonstrated the best predictive performance (AUROC 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.90; p-value > 0.05 in the Hosmer-Lemeshow test; predicted-to-observed ratio 1.09). The majority of models showed acceptable discrimination power. In calibration, only the DiaBetter score did not lose goodness-of-fit in all analyzed groups.

conclusionThe DiaBetter score seems to be the most appropriate tool to predict diabetes remission after metabolic surgery since it presents adequate accuracy and is convenient to use in clinical practice. There are no accurate models to predict T2DM remission in a patient with advanced diabetes.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidGastrectomyHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBariatric surgeryDiabetes remissionExternal validationMetabolic surgeryRisk prediction scoresType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID34255166
PMCPMC8847237
OpenAlexW3178277342

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.