ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2021
Profiles of Hospitalized Patients with Angiographic Coronary Heart Disease in Taiwan during 2014-2016: Report of a Tertiary Hospital.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Presentation cardiac troponin and early computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a pre-specified secondary analysis of the RAPID-CTCA trial.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2022Trial
- The Prognostic Value of D-Dimer in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study in Taiwan.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2024Article
- Efficacy of Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2023Article
- Computed tomography coronary angiography in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Changes of antithrombotic prescription in atrial fibrillation patients with acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention and the subsequent impact on long-term outcomes: a longitudinal cohort study.Thrombosis journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC) has established multicenter registries for coronary artery disease (CAD) to investigate clinical characteristics, management and risks for mortality. However, the impacts of newly-emerged evidence-based therapies, including the use of drug-eluting stents (DESs), on patients with CAD in Taiwan remain unclear.
methodsThe Tri-Service General Hospital-Coronary Heart Disease (TSGH-CHD) registry is a single-center, prospective, longitudinal registry in Taiwan containing data from 2014-2016. Individuals who were admitted for coronary angiography were enrolled. Patient profiles, management and in-hospital outcome data were collected.
resultsWe included 3352 patients: 2349 with stable angina and 1003 with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In the stable angina group, both patients receiving stenting and those receiving medical treatment had a 0.7% mortality rate; DESs were used in 70.4% of the patients receiving stenting. In the ACS group, the patients receiving stenting and those receiving medical treatment had a 4.9% and 10.7% mortality rate, respectively; DESs were used in 63.1% of the patients receiving stenting. In the 2008-2010 Taiwan ACS registry, DESs were used in only 28% of all stenting procedures, and the estimated hospital mortality rate was 1.8%. Multivariate analysis indicated that older age, prior stroke, and cardiogenic shock on admission were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in the ACS group.
conclusionsCompared with the Taiwan ACS cohort, the TSGH-CHD registry revealed increased DES use and increased disease complexity and severity after 2010. Although unlikely to significantly improve survival, interventionists seemed to perform high-risk procedures for complex CAD more often in the new DES era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.