Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34262299›Full record

ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2021

Safety of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Japanese Patients with Asthma: A Long-Term (52-Week) Phase III Open-Label Study.

Soichiro Hozawa, Hiroyuki Ohbayashi, Michiko Tsuchiya, Yu Hara, Laurie A Lee, Takashi Nakayama, Jun Tamaoki, Andrew Fowler, Takanobu Nishi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03184987 (A Phase III, 52-week, Open-label Study to Evaluate Long-term Safety of Fixed Dose Combination Therapy Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol Trifenatate in Japanese Patients With Asthma), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03184987 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, 52-week, Open-label Study to Evaluate Long-term Safety of Fixed Dose Combination Therapy Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol Trifenatate in Japanese Patients With Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2017 to 2019Enrolled111ConditionsAsthmaArmsFF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg, FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg, Salbutamol, ACQ-7
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Soichiro HozawaHiroshima Allergy and Respiratory Clinic, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroyuki OhbayashiTohno Chuo Clinic, Gifu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5186-8761
Michiko TsuchiyaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yu HaraDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Laurie A LeeGSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Takashi NakayamaGSK, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1948-6373
Jun TamaokiGSK, Tokyo, Japan.
Andrew FowlerGSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Takanobu NishiGSK, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2272-6833
GlaxoSmithKline (Japan) · JPGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USRakuwakai Otowa Hospital · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe pivotal CAPTAIN study reported a favorable safety profile with once-daily inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was a Phase III, 52-week, multicenter, non-comparator, non-randomized, open-label study (NCT03184987) in Japanese adults receiving maintenance therapy with ICS/LABA, with or without LAMA. At enrollment, patients were allocated to either FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25mcg (Group 1) or 200/62.5/25mcg (Group 2). Patients in Group 1 could have their treatment stepped up to 200/62.5/25mcg at Week 24 if their Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-7 score was >0.75. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Secondary endpoints included vital signs, electrocardiogram measurements, and clinical laboratory tests (biochemistry, hematology, urinalysis). Efficacy was assessed as "other" endpoints.

resultsA total of 111 Japanese patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Overall, 77 (69%) patients reported ≥1 AE (Group 1: n=30 [64%]; step-up group: n=7 [78%]; Group 2: n=40 [73%]). SAEs were reported for 1 (2.1%) and 2 (3.6%) patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. All SAEs were considered unrelated to study treatment. One AE and one SAE led to study withdrawal: oropharyngeal discomfort (Group 1); eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Group 2). No new safety concerns were identified throughout the 52-week treatment period.

conclusionIn this uncontrolled open-label study, no new safety concerns were observed with long-term (52 weeks) treatment with once-daily FF/UMEC/VI among 111 Japanese patients with asthma.

Indexed as

asthmainhalersJapansafetytreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID34262299
PMCPMC8275015
OpenAlexW3181275516

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.