Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34264328›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Personal Formularies of Primary Care Physicians Across 4 Health Care Systems.

William Galanter, Tewodros Eguale, Walid Gellad, Bruce Lambert, Maria Mirica, John Cashy, Alejandra Salazar, Lynn A Volk, Suzanne Falck, John Shilka and 11 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Missing Funding/Support.JAMA network open · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

William GalanterDepartment of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
Tewodros EgualeMassachusetts College of Pharmacy, Boston.
Walid GelladVeterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bruce LambertNorthwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Maria MiricaMass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
John CashyVeterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Alejandra SalazarMass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lynn A VolkMass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Suzanne FalckDepartment of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
John ShilkaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
Elizabeth Van DrilDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
Jennie JarrettDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
John ZuluetaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
Julie FiskioMass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
John OravMass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Diana NorwichTufts Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Samuel BennettEmory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Diane SegerMass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Adam WrightVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jeffrey A LinderNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Gordon SchiffMass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mass General Brigham · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · USEmory University · USMCPHS University · USNorthwestern Medicine · USNorthwestern University · USTufts Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: More conservative prescribing has the potential to reduce adverse drug events and patient harm and cost; however, no method exists defining the extent to which individual clinicians prescribe conservatively. One potential domain is prescribing a more limited number of drugs. Personal formularies-defined as the number and mix of unique, newly initiated drugs prescribed by a physician-may enable comparisons among clinicians, practices, and institutions. Objectives: To develop a method of defining primary care physicians' personal formularies and examine how they differ among primary care physicians at 4 institutions; evaluate associations between personal formularies and patient, physician, and practice site characteristics; and empirically derive and examine the variability of the top 200 core drugs prescribed at the 4 sites. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 4 US health care systems among 4655 internal and family medicine physicians and 4 930 707 patients who had at least 1 visit to these physicians between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018. Exposures: Personal formulary size was defined as the number of unique, newly initiated drugs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Personal formulary size and drugs used, physician and patient characteristics, core drugs, and analysis of selected drug classes. Results: The study population included 4655 primary care physicians (2274 women [48.9%]; mean [SD] age, 48.5 [4.4] years) and 4 930 707 patients (16.5% women; mean [SD] age, 51.9 [8.3] years). There were 41 378 903 outpatient prescriptions written, of which 9 496 766 (23.0%) were new starts. Institution median personal formulary size ranged from 150 (interquartile range, 82.0-212.0) to 296 (interquartile range, 230.0-347.0) drugs. In multivariable modeling, personal formulary size was significantly associated with panel size (total number of unique patients with face-to-face encounters during the study period; 1.2 medications per 100 patients), physician's total number of encounters (5.7 drugs per 10% increase), and physician's sex (-6.2 drugs per 100 patients for female physicians). There were 1527 unique, newly prescribed drugs across the 4 sites. Fewer than half the drugs (626 [41.0%]) were used at every site. Physicians' prescribing of drugs from a pooled core list varied from 0% to 100% of their prescriptions. Conclusions and Relevance: Personal formularies, measured at the level of individual physicians and institutions, reveal variability in size and mix of drugs. Similarly, defining a list of commonly prescribed core drugs in primary care revealed interphysician and interinstitutional differences. Personal formularies and core medication lists enable comparisons and may identify outliers and opportunities for safer and more appropriate prescribing.

Indexed as

AdultDelivery of Health CareDrug PrescriptionsFemaleFormularies as TopicHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians, Primary CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34264328
PMCPMC8283562
OpenAlexW3178190605

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.