ArticlePloS one2021
Genotypic analysis of the female BPH/5 mouse, a model of superimposed preeclampsia.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for assessing maternal cardiovascular physiology during pregnancy and postpartum.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024Guideline
- Experimental Animal Models of Preeclampsia: Mechanisms, Strengths, and Translational Relevance.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026Review
- Hypertensive Pregnancy Disorders: From Mechanisms to Management.American journal of hypertension · 2026Review
- Peripartum dapagliflozin improves late-life maternal cardiovascular outcomes in a murine model of superimposed preeclampsia.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
- Pathophysiology of Maternal Obesity and Hypertension in Pregnancy.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Intrauterine growth-restricted pregnant rats, from placental ischemic dams, display preeclamptic-like symptoms: A new rat model of preeclampsia.Physiological reports · 2024Article
- Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors Are Dysregulated at the BPH/5 Mouse Preeclamptic-Like Maternal-Fetal Interface.Biology · 2024Article
- RISING STARS: Approaches to modeling placental function in preeclampsia in vitro and in vivo.The Journal of endocrinology · 2023Article
- Vascular changes in the cycling and early pregnant uterus.JCI insight · 2023Review
- Sexually dimorphic pubertal development and adipose tissue kisspeptin dysregulation in the obese and preeclamptic-like BPH/5 mouse model offspring.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Mouse models of preeclampsia with preexisting comorbidities.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- Alternative pathway activation in pregnancy, a measured amount "complements" a successful pregnancy, too much results in adverse events.Immunological reviews · 2023Review
- Kisspeptin Is Upregulated at the Maternal-Fetal Interface of the Preeclamptic-like BPH/5 Mouse and Normalized after Synchronization of Sex Steroid Hormones.Reproductive medicine (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Reliability of Rodent and Rabbit Models in Preeclampsia Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Sex-specific effects of maternal weight loss on offspring cardiometabolic outcomes in the obese preeclamptic-like mouse model, BPH/5.Physiological reports · 2022Article
- The anti-inflammatory properties of the methanolic extract ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
- Animal Models of Preeclampsia: Mechanistic Insights and Promising Therapeutics.Endocrinology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Animal models that recapitulate human diseases and disorders are widely used to investigate etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of those conditions in people. Disorders during pregnancy are particularly difficult to explore as interventions in pregnant women are not easily performed. Therefore, models that allow for pre-conception investigations are advantageous for elucidating the mechanisms involved in adverse pregnancy outcomes that are responsible for both maternal and fetal morbidity, such as preeclampsia. The Blood Pressure High (BPH)/5 mouse model has been used extensively to study the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. The female BPH/5 mouse is obese with increased adiposity and borderline hypertension, both of which are exacerbated with pregnancy making it a model of superimposed preeclampsia. Thus, the BPH/5 model shares traits with a large majority of women with pre-existing conditions that predisposes them to preeclampsia. We sought to explore the genome of the BPH/5 female mouse and determine the genetic underpinnings that may contribute to preeclampsia-associated phenotypes in this model. Using a whole genome sequencing approach, we are the first to characterize the genetic mutations in BPH/5 female mice that make it unique from the closely related BPH/2 model and the normotensive background strain, C57Bl/6. We found the BPH/5 female mouse to be uniquely different from BPH/2 and C57Bl/6 mice with a genetically complex landscape. The majority of non-synonymous consequences within the coding region of BPH/5 females were missense mutations found most abundant on chromosome X when comparing BPH/5 and BPH/2, and on chromosome 8 when comparing BPH/5 to C57Bl/6. Genetic mutations in BPH/5 females largely belong to immune system-related processes, with overlap between BPH/5 and BPH/2 models. Further studies examining each gene mutation during pregnancy are warranted to determine key contributors to the BPH/5 preeclamptic-like phenotype and to identify genetic similarities to women that develop preeclampsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.