Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34272579›Full record

ReviewInflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.]2021

The pathophysiology of immunoporosis: innovative therapeutic targets.

Mouna Ferbebouh, Francis Vallières, Mohamed Benderdour, Julio Fernandes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of comparative safety in randomized controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mouna FerbebouhOrthopedics Research Laboratory, Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, 5400 boul. Gouin ouest, Montréal, Québec, H4J 1C5, Canada.
Francis VallièresOrthopedics Research Laboratory, Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, 5400 boul. Gouin ouest, Montréal, Québec, H4J 1C5, Canada.
Mohamed BenderdourOrthopedics Research Laboratory, Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, 5400 boul. Gouin ouest, Montréal, Québec, H4J 1C5, Canada.
Julio FernandesOrthopedics Research Laboratory, Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, 5400 boul. Gouin ouest, Montréal, Québec, H4J 1C5, Canada. julio.c.fernandes@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3888-832X
Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe physiological balance between bone resorption and bone formation is now known to be mediated by a cascade of events parallel to the classic osteoblast-osteoclast interaction. Thus, osteoimmunology now encompasses the role played by other cell types, such as cytokines, lymphocytes and chemokines, in immunological responses and how they help modulate bone metabolism. All these factors have an impact on the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway, which is the major pathway for the maturation and resorption activity of osteoclast precursor cells, responsible for osteoporosis development. Recently, immunoporosis has emerged as a new research area in osteoimmunology dedicated to the immune system's role in osteoporosis.

methodsThe first part of this review presents theoretical concepts on the factors involved in the skeletal system and osteoimmunology. Secondly, existing treatments and novel therapeutic approaches to treat osteoporosis are summarized. These were selected from to the most recent studies published on PubMed containing the term osteoporosis. All data relate to the results of in vitro and in vivo studies on the osteoimmunological system of humans, mice and rats.

findingsTreatments for osteoporosis can be classified into two categories. They either target osteoclastogenesis inhibition (denosumab, bisphosphonates), or they aim to restore the number and function of osteoblasts (romozumab, abaloparatide). Even novel therapies, such as resolvins, gene therapy, and mesenchymal stem cell transplantation, fall within this classification system.

conclusionThis review presents alternative pathways in the pathophysiology of osteoporosis, along with some recent therapeutic breakthroughs to restore bone homeostasis.

Indexed as

Bone RemodelingAnimalsBone ResorptionChemokinesChitosanGenetic TherapyHumansImmune SystemLymphocytesMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiceNanoparticlesOsteoblastsOsteoclastsOsteocytesOsteogenesisChemokinesChitosanOsteoprotegerinRANK LigandRNA, Small InterferingTNFSF11 protein, humanImmunoporosisLymphocytesNanoparticlesOsteoblastsOsteoclastsOsteocytesOsteoporosisRANKLResolvins

Identifiers

PMID34272579
OpenAlexW3180831063

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.