Evidence mapPaperPMID 34274021Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2021

Design and validation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess the dietary intake for adults in pastoral settings in Northern Tanzania.

Ahmed Gharib Khamis, Akwilina Wendelin Mwanri, Julius Edward Ntwenya, Mbazi Senkoro, Katharina Kreppel, Bassirou Bonfoh, Sayoki Godfrey Mfinanga, Gideon Kwesigabo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed Gharib KhamisDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania. ahmadboycd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1689-8930
Akwilina Wendelin MwanriDepartment of Food Technology, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Julius Edward NtwenyaDepartment of Public Health, The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Mbazi SenkoroNational Institute for Medical Research, Muhimbili Medical Research Centre, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.
Katharina KreppelSchool of Life Sciences and Bio-Engineering, Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.
Bassirou BonfohCentre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte D'Ivoire, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Sayoki Godfrey MfinangaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania.
Gideon KwesigaboDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania.
Ifakara Health Institute · TZMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZNational Institute for Medical Research · TZSokoine University of Agriculture · TZSwiss Centre for Scientific Research · CIThe University of Dodoma · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFood frequency questionnaires are widely used as a dietary assessment tool in nutritional epidemiology to determine the relationship between diet and diseases. In Tanzania, there are several cultural variations in food intake which makes it necessary to design and validate a culture-specific food frequency questionnaire (CFFQ). Therefore, we designed a 27-items CFFQ and examine its validity in pastoral communities. Validity of CFFQ was assessed by comparing nutrient intake estimated from the CFFQ against the average from two 24-h diet recall (2R24). Spearman's correlation coefficients, cross classification and Bland-Altman's methods were used to assess the validity of CFFQ.

resultsA total of 130 adults aged 18 years and above completed both CFFQ and 2R24. Correlation coefficients between CFFQ and 2R24 ranged from low (r = - 0.07) to moderate (r = 0.37). The correlation coefficients were moderately significant for kilocalories (r = 0.31, p < 0.001), carbohydrate (r = 0.33, p < 0.001), magnesium (r = 0.37, p < 0.001), and iron (r = 0.34, p < 0.001). On average, about 69% of participants were correctly classified into the same or adjacent quartile of energy and nutrient intake, while 9% were misclassified by the CFFQ. Bland-Altman's plot demonstrated that the CFFQ had acceptable agreement with the 2R24.

Indexed as

DietEnergy IntakeDiet RecordsDiet SurveysEatingNutrition AssessmentReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTanzaniaDiet recallFood frequency questionnairePastoralistsRelative validity

Identifiers

PMID34274021
PMCPMC8285883
OpenAlexW3184032930

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.