Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34276555›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2021

Clinical Characteristics and Risk of Diabetic Complications in Data-Driven Clusters Among Type 2 Diabetes.

Lin Xing, Fangyu Peng, Qian Liang, Xiaoshuang Dai, Junli Ren, Han Wu, Shufen Yang, Yaxin Zhu, Lijing Jia, Shancen Zhao

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lin XingBGI Institute of Applied Agriculture, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Fangyu PengBGI Institute of Applied Agriculture, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Qian LiangEndocrinology Department, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaoshuang DaiBGI Institute of Applied Agriculture, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Junli RenBGI Institute of Applied Agriculture, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Han WuEndocrinology Department, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Shufen YangEndocrinology Department, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yaxin ZhuEndocrinology Department, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Lijing JiaEndocrinology Department, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Shancen ZhaoBGI Institute of Applied Agriculture, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
BGI Group (China) · CNShenZhen People’s Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to cluster newly diagnosed patients and patients with long-term diabetes and to explore the clinical characteristics, risk of diabetes complications, and medication treatment related to each cluster. Research Design and Methods: K-means clustering analysis was performed on 1,060 Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes based on five variables (HbA1c, age at diagnosis, BMI, HOMA2-IR, and HOMA2-B). The clinical features, risk of diabetic complications, and the utilization of elven types of medications agents related to each cluster were evaluated with the chi-square test and the Tukey-Kramer method. Results: Four replicable clusters were identified, severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD), severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD), mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD), and mild age-related diabetes (MARD). In terms of clinical characteristics, there were significant differences in blood pressure, renal function, and lipids among clusters. Furthermore, individuals in SIRD had the highest prevalence of stages 2 and 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) (57%) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) (67%), while individuals in SIDD had the highest risk of diabetic retinopathy (32%), albuminuria (31%) and lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) (13%). Additionally, the difference in medication treatment of clusters were observed in metformin (p = 0.012), α-glucosidase inhibitor (AGI) (p = 0.006), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4) (p = 0.017), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) (p <0.001), insulin (p <0.001), and statins (p = 0.006). Conclusions: The newly diagnosed patients and patients with long-term diabetes can be consistently clustered into featured clusters. Each cluster had significantly different patient characteristics, risk of diabetic complications, and medication treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood PressureChinaCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesDiabetic NeuropathiesFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsKidneyMaleMetforminMiddle AgedHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminclinical characteristicsdiabetic complicationk-meansmedication treatmenttype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID34276555
PMCPMC8281969
OpenAlexW3173349510

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.