Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34276842›Full record

ArticlePrzeglad gastroenterologiczny

Selection of surgical procedures and analysis of prognostic factors in patients with primary gastric tumour based on Cox regression: a SEER database analysis based on data mining.

Cheng Xu, Qingling Chen, Fan Ye, Qi Fan, Qing Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cheng XuCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, China.
Qingling ChenCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, China.
Fan YeSchool of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.
Qi FanCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, China.
Qing WangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, China.
Huaibei Normal University · CNMacau University of Science and Technology · MO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are numerous types of surgery for patients with primary gastric tumour, which can be summarized as radical surgery or palliative surgery. Different surgical procedures will have further effects for different stage of patients.

aimWe will use the resources of the SEER database (2010-2015) to explore the therapeutic value of surgery and prognostic factors. MATERIAL AND

methodsKaplan-Meier analysis/log-rank testing for data analysis and multivariate analysis was conducted through a Cox proportional model.

resultsFourteen thousand five hundred and seven cases of primary gastric tumours identified in the period from 2010 to 2015. In a multivariate cox regression analysis, the following factors were associated with better primary gastric patients survival (Surgical method, Age at diagnosis, histological grade). Through Kaplan-Meier analysis (

conclusionsAmong patients with multivariate Cox regression model, type of surgery, age at diagnosis, and histological grade were the top 3 factors affecting patient survival. In palliative surgery, laser excision is the best surgical method of local tumour excision, and the survival of patients of this group is obviously better than in other groups. In radical surgery, near-total gastrectomy and radical gastrectomy, in continuity with the resection of other organs, are better surgical methods, while gastrectomy (partial, subtotal, hemi-) is the worst type of surgery in terms of prognosis, and even the survival rate in the later stage (after 3 years) is worse than in the group without surgery.

Indexed as

gastric cancerprognosisSEERsurgical method

Identifiers

PMID34276842
PMCPMC8275962
OpenAlexW3166788292

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.