Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34283285›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2021

Effect of locally delivered adjunctive antibiotics during surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sarah Yusri, Ahmed Elfana, Weam Elbattawy, Karim M Fawzy El-Sayed

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotics in periodontal treatment: an umbrella review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Novel small molecule targeting PgQC reducesFrontiers in oral health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sarah Yusri *Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Al Saraya Str. 11, Manial, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed Elfana *Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Al Saraya Str. 11, Manial, Cairo, Egypt.
Weam ElbattawyOral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Al Saraya Str. 11, Manial, Cairo, Egypt.
Karim M Fawzy El-SayedOral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Al Saraya Str. 11, Manial, Cairo, Egypt. karim.fawzy@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6261-3609
Cairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe present study aimed to systematically assess current evidence on effects of locally delivered antibiotics during periodontal surgery compared to periodontal surgery alone on clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction, recession depth (RD) changes, gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque index (PI). METHODOLOGY: MEDLINE-PubMed, Cochrane-CENTRAL and Scopus databases were searched up to April 2021 for randomized clinical trials (RCT), evaluating effects of locally delivered antibiotics during periodontal surgery. CAL gain served as primary, while PPD reduction, RD changes, GI and PI as secondary outcomes. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess possible bias. Data were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed where appropriate.

resultScreening of 2314 papers resulted in nine eligible studies. No adverse events were reported. Data on outcome variables were pooled and analyzed using generic inverse variance model and presented as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Statistically significant improvements in favor of antibiotics' delivery were observed in studies with follow-up of ≤6 months for CAL gain (WMD = 0.61 mm (95% CI [0.07, 1.14]; p = 0.03), PPD reduction (WMD = 0.41 mm (95% CI [0.02, 0.80]; p = 0.04)) and BOP (WMD = -28.47% (95% CI [-33.00, -23.94]); p < 0.001), while for GI improvements were notable for >6 to 12 months (WMD = -0.27 (95% CI [-0.49, -0.06]; p = 0.01)).

conclusionWithin the current review's limitations, locally delivered antibiotics during surgical periodontal therapy results in post-surgical improvements for CAL, PPD, and BOP (≤6 months) with a longer-lasting GI improvement. Further randomized controlled trials are needed with true periodontal end-points to assess the ideal antibiotic agent, dosage, and delivery methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Local delivery of antibiotics during periodontal surgery improved clinical parameters for up to 6-month follow-up, with beneficial longer effects on gingival inflammation. Within the current study's limitation, the presented evidence could support the elective usage of locally delivered antibiotics during surgical periodontal therapy.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsOral Surgical ProceduresDental CareDental ScalingHumansPeriodontal IndexAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-bacterialAntibioticsLocalPeriodontal therapySurgicalSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34283285
PMCPMC8370941
OpenAlexW3185201691

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.