Evidence mapPaperPMID 34285005Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

A

Emily Brown, Moon M Wilton, Victoria S Sprung, Joanne A Harrold, Jason C G Halford, Andrej Stancak, Malcolm Burgess, Elaine Howarth, A Margot Umpleby, Graham J Kemp and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Emily BrownMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK c.e.brown@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1097-0580
Moon M WiltonDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Victoria S SprungResearch Institute for Sport & Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2666-4986
Joanne A HarroldDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jason C G HalfordSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Andrej StancakDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Malcolm BurgessDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Elaine HowarthLiverpool Clinical Trials Centre, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.
A Margot UmplebyDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Graham J KempLiverpool Magnetic Resonance Imaging Centre (LiMRIC), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
John Ph WildingMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Daniel J CuthbertsonDepartment of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBCenter for Health, Exercise and Sport Sciences · RSUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe newer glucose-lowering therapies for type 2 diabetes (T2D), the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) and the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), have additional clinical benefits beyond improving glycaemic control; promoting weight loss, addressing associated cardiovascular risk factors and reducing macrovascular and microvascular complications. Considering their independent mechanisms of actions, there is a potential for significant synergy with combination therapy, yet limited data exist. This 32-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will gain mechanistic insight into the effects of coadministration of exenatide QW, a weekly subcutaneous GLP1-RA, with dapagliflozin, a once daily oral SGLT2i, on the dynamic, adaptive changes in energy balance, total, regional and organ-specific fat mass and multiorgan insulin sensitivity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 110 obese patients with diagnosed T2D (glycated haemoglobin, HbA ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the North West Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee (14/NW/1147) and is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice. Results from the study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific and open access journals and/or presented at scientific conferences and summarised for distribution to the participants. TRIAL SPONSOR: University of Liverpool. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 52028580; EUDRACT number 2015-005242-60.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Benzhydryl CompoundsBlood GlucoseDouble-Blind MethodExenatideGlucosidesGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsObesityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBenzhydryl CompoundsBlood GlucosedapagliflozinExenatideGlucosidesGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic Agentscardiologygeneral diabetesgeneral endocrinology

Identifiers

PMID34285005
PMCPMC8292819
OpenAlexW3184390318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.