ArticlePediatric research2022
Elevated circulating endothelial microparticles (EMPs) in prepubertal children born preterm.
Article in Pediatric research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndothelial microparticles (EMPs) act as early biomarkers of endothelial activation and damage. No studies have investigated EMPs in preterm-born individuals.
methodsSixty-three preterm-born children and 52 children born full-term (controls) were studied. Circulating CD62E(+), CD144(+), and CD31(+)/CD42b(-) EMPs were measured in preterm-born children compared to controls; possible associations with cardiovascular risk factors and endothelial function parameters were also assessed.
resultsCirculating CD62E(+), CD144(+), and CD31(+)/CD42b(-) EMPs were significantly higher in preterm-born children compared to controls (p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Preterm birth was recognized as an independent predictor of each EMP subpopulation studied; moreover, the mean pressure and velocity of pulmonary artery were independently correlated with CD62E(+) (β = 0.20, p = 0.04) and CD144(+) EMPs (β = 0.22, p = 0.02), respectively, whereas age (β = 0.21, p = 0.03) and being born SGA (β = 0.26, p = 0.01) correlated independently with CD31(+)/CD42b(-) EMPs in the study population. Furthermore, diastolic blood pressure (β = 0.24, p = 0.04), being born SGA (β = 0.24, p = 0.04) and the hyperemic peak velocity of the brachial artery (β = -0.65, p = 0.02) were independently associated with CD31(+)/CD42b(-) EMPs in the preterm-born group.
conclusionCirculating EMPs were higher in preterm-born children compared to children born full-term. Whether EMPs could act, in clinical practice, as a complementary tool for non-invasive evaluation of endothelium in preterm-born children, remains under investigation. IMPACT: Circulating endothelial microparticles (EMPs) are small membrane vesicles released from endothelial cells and they act as novel biomarkers of endothelial activation and damage. No studies have investigated circulating EMPs in preterm-born individuals. Circulating EMPs were significantly higher in prepubertal preterm-born children compared to children born at term. In the preterm-born group, the hyperemic peak velocity of the brachial artery was independently associated with CD31(+)/CD42b(-) EMPs. Whether assessment of circulating EMPs could act, in clinical practice, as a complementary tool for non-invasive evaluation of endothelium in preterm-born children, remains to be defined in future investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.