Evidence mapPaperPMID 34286894Full record

ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2021

An indirect treatment comparison of the efficacy of semaglutide 1.0 mg versus dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg.

Richard E Pratley, Andrei-Mircea Catarig, Ildiko Lingvay, Adie Viljoen, Abby Paine, Jack Lawson, Barrie Chubb, Anders Gorst-Rasmussen, Nino Miresashvili

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06243536 (The Effect of Semaglutide on Disordered Eating Behaviour in Type 2 Diabetic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06243536 phase4unknown statusstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Semaglutide on Disordered Eating Behaviour in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Ran2024Enrolled60Registered outcomes3Posted comparisons0ConditionsDisordered Eating Behaviors, Overweight, Type 2 DiabetesArmssemaglutide, Standard of care
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg vs. dulaglutide 3 mg and 4.5 mg in the UK.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Richard E PratleyAdventHealth Translational Research Institute, Orlando, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2912-1389
Andrei-Mircea CatarigNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Ildiko LingvayDepartment of Internal Medicine/Endocrinology, Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7006-7401
Adie ViljoenBorthwick Diabetes Research Centre, Stevenage, UK.
Abby PaineZedediah Consulting on behalf of DRG Abacus (part of Clarivate), Wokingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2332-1099
Jack LawsonNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Barrie ChubbNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7271-051X
Anders Gorst-RasmussenNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Nino MiresashviliNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare the effects of semaglutide 1.0 mg versus dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg on HbA1c and body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND

methodsA Bucher indirect comparison was conducted to compare efficacy outcomes of semaglutide 1.0 mg versus dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg using published results from the SUSTAIN 7 and AWARD-11 trials. Sensitivity analyses using individual patient data from SUSTAIN 7 and aggregate data from AWARD-11 were conducted to explore the impact of adjustment for cross-trial imbalances in baseline characteristics.

resultsSemaglutide 1.0 mg significantly reduced HbA1c versus dulaglutide 3.0 mg, with an estimated treatment difference (ETD) of -0.24%-points (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.43, -0.05), with comparable reductions in HbA1c versus dulaglutide 4.5 mg with an ETD of -0.07%-points (95% CI -0.26, 0.12). Semaglutide 1.0 mg significantly reduced body weight versus dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg with an ETD of -2.65 kg (95% CI -3.57, -1.73) and -1.95 kg (95% CI -2.87, -1.03), respectively. Sensitivity analyses supported the primary analysis findings.

conclusionsThis indirect comparison showed significantly greater reductions in HbA1c with semaglutide 1.0 mg versus dulaglutide 3.0 mg and comparable HbA1c reductions versus dulaglutide 4.5 mg. Semaglutide 1.0 mg significantly reduced body weight versus both dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg. With several glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists available, information regarding their comparative efficacy can be valuable to clinicians.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucagon-Like PeptidesGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSemaglutidedulaglutideGlucagon-Like PeptidesGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSemaglutidedulaglutideGLP-1 receptor agonistindirect comparisonsemaglutidetype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID34286894
PMCPMC9291551

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.