ReviewJournal of developmental biology2021
There and Back Again: Hox Clusters Use Both DNA Strands.
Review in Journal of developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward a cell-type-specific lung HOX code.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Differential expression analysis of lncRNA and mRNA in ovarian tissues of Pishan Red Sheep and Hu Sheep with distinct genotypes during estrus.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Epigenetic Biomarkers as a New Diagnostic Tool in Bladder Cancer-From Early Detection to Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Role of homeobox genes in cancer: immune system interactions, long non-coding RNAs, and tumor progression.Molecular biology reports · 2024Review
- Special Issue "Hox Genes in Development: New Paradigms".Journal of developmental biology · 2022Article
- Evolution of the insect Hox gene cluster: Comparative analysis across 243 species.Seminars in cell & developmental biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bilaterian animals operate the clusters of Hox genes through a rich repertoire of diverse mechanisms. In this review, we will summarize and analyze the accumulated data concerning long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) that are transcribed from sense (coding) DNA strands of Hox clusters. It was shown that antisense regulatory RNAs control the work of Hox genes in cis and trans, participate in the establishment and maintenance of the epigenetic code of Hox loci, and can even serve as a source of regulatory peptides that switch cellular energetic metabolism. Moreover, these molecules can be considered as a force that consolidates the cluster into a single whole. We will discuss the examples of antisense transcription of Hox genes in well-studied systems (cell cultures, morphogenesis of vertebrates) and bear upon some interesting examples of antisense Hox RNAs in non-model Protostomia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.