Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34302467›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2021

Exploring "Return to Productivity" Among People Living With Burn Injury: A Burn Model System National Database Report.

Clifford C Sheckter, Sabina Brych, Gretchen J Carrougher, Steven E Wolf, Jeffrey C Schneider, Nicole Gibran, Barclay T Stewart

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Peer Support Groups: Identifying Disparities to Improve Participation.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Clifford C SheckterDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9526-4062
Sabina BrychUW Medicine Regional Burn Center, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Gretchen J CarrougherUW Medicine Regional Burn Center, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Steven E WolfShriners Burns Hospital, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA.
Jeffrey C SchneiderDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Spaulding Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nicole GibranUW Medicine Regional Burn Center, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Barclay T StewartUW Medicine Regional Burn Center, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
University of Washington · USHarvard University · USSanta Clara Valley Medical Center · USShriners Hospitals for Children - Galveston · US

Funding

ACL HHS 90DPBU0001ACL HHS 90DPBU0003ACL HHS 90DPBU0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn survivors experience barriers to returning to work. For those who do return to work, little is known regarding whether they achieve preinjury productivity (i.e., equivalent or gain in income compared to preinjury income). Identifying patients at risk of not achieving preinjury productivity is important for targeting services that support this population. They extracted occupational and income data through 24 months postinjury from the multicenter, longitudinal Burn Model System National Database. Annual income was reported in six groups: <$25k, $25k-50k, $50k-99k, $100k-149k, $150k-199k, and $>199k. Participants were classified by change in income at each follow-up (i.e., gain, loss, and equivalent). Explanatory variables included demographics, injury characteristics, insurance payer, employment status, and job type. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression was used to model return to productivity. Four hundred fifty-three participants provided complete income data at discharge and follow-up. Of the 302 participants employed preinjury, 180 (60%) returned to work within 24 months postinjury. Less than half (138) returned to productivity (46% of participants employed preinjury; 77% of those who returned to work). Characteristics associated with return to productivity included older age (median 46.9 vs 45.9 years, OR 1.03, P = .006), Hispanic ethnicity (24% vs 11%, OR 1.80, P = 0.041), burn size >20% TBSA (33.7% vs 33.0%, OR 2.09, P = 0.045), and postinjury employment (54% vs 26%, OR 3.41, P < 0.001). More than half of employed people living with burn injury experienced loss in productivity within 24 months postinjury. Even if they return to work, people living with burn injuries face challenges returning to productivity and may benefit from vocational rehabilitation and/or financial assistance.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionAgedBurnsDatabases, FactualEmploymentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedReturn to WorkSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34302467
PMCPMC9255661
OpenAlexW3145023805

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.