Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34313331›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2021

Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the early detection of dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, Nadja Smailagic, Marta Roqué-Figuls, Agustín Ciapponi, Erick Sanchez-Perez, Antri Giannakou, Olga L Pedraza, Xavier Bonfill Cosp, Sarah Cullum

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07165236 (Association of Perioperative Cognitive Dysfunction With Circulating Biomarkers of Neurological Damage in Patients Underging Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor), which is not on this map. Cited by 289 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
289citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
41.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07165236 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Association of Perioperative Cognitive Dysfunction With Circulating Biomarkers of Neurological Damage in Patients Underging Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor

TypeobservationalSponsorOsijek University HospitalRan2024 to 2029Enrolled42ConditionsCognitive Decline, Urinary Bladder Cancer, Frail, Biomarker
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

289 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 432 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. The Footprint ofCurrent Alzheimer research · 2025
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

229 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Ingrid Arevalo-RodriguezClinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS). CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Nadja SmailagicInstitute of Public Health, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UK.
Marta Roqué-FigulsIberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.
Agustín CiapponiArgentine Cochrane Centre, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Erick Sanchez-PerezNeurosciences, Hospital Infantil Universitario de San José-FUCS, Bogotá, Colombia.
Antri GiannakouSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Olga L PedrazaNeurosciences, Hospital Infantil Universitario de San José-FUCS, Bogotá, Colombia.
Xavier Bonfill CospIberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.
Sarah CullumDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Hospital Universitario Infantil San José · COConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARIberoamerican Cochrane Centre · ESInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia is a progressive global cognitive impairment syndrome. In 2010, more than 35 million people worldwide were estimated to be living with dementia. Some people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) will progress to dementia but others remain stable or recover full function. There is great interest in finding good predictors of dementia in people with MCI. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the best-known and the most often used short screening tool for providing an overall measure of cognitive impairment in clinical, research and community settings.

objectivesTo determine the accuracy of the Mini Mental State Examination for the early detection of dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment SEARCH

methodsWe searched ALOIS (Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Specialized Register of diagnostic and intervention studies (inception to May 2014); MEDLINE (OvidSP) (1946 to May 2014); EMBASE (OvidSP) (1980 to May 2014); BIOSIS (Web of Science) (inception to May 2014); Web of Science Core Collection, including the Conference Proceedings Citation Index (ISI Web of Science) (inception to May 2014); PsycINFO (OvidSP) (inception to May 2014), and LILACS (BIREME) (1982 to May 2014). We also searched specialized sources of diagnostic test accuracy studies and reviews, most recently in May 2014: MEDION (Universities of Maastricht and Leuven, www.mediondatabase.nl), DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, via the Cochrane Library), HTA Database (Health Technology Assessment Database, via the Cochrane Library), and ARIF (University of Birmingham, UK, www.arif.bham.ac.uk). No language or date restrictions were applied to the electronic searches and methodological filters were not used as a method to restrict the search overall so as to maximize sensitivity. We also checked reference lists of relevant studies and reviews, tracked citations in Scopus and Science Citation Index, used searches of known relevant studies in PubMed to track related articles, and contacted research groups conducting work on MMSE for dementia diagnosis to try to locate possibly relevant but unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered longitudinal studies in which results of the MMSE administered to MCI participants at baseline were obtained and the reference standard was obtained by follow-up over time. We included participants recruited and clinically classified as individuals with MCI under Petersen and revised Petersen criteria, Matthews criteria, or a Clinical Dementia Rating = 0.5. We used acceptable and commonly used reference standards for dementia in general, Alzheimer's dementia, Lewy body dementia, vascular dementia and frontotemporal dementia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We screened all titles generated by the electronic database searches. Two review authors independently assessed the abstracts of all potentially relevant studies. We assessed the identified full papers for eligibility and extracted data to create two by two tables for dementia in general and other dementias. Two authors independently performed quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool. Due to high heterogeneity and scarcity of data, we derived estimates of sensitivity at fixed values of specificity from the model we fitted to produce the summary receiver operating characteristic curve. MAIN

resultsIn this review, we included 11 heterogeneous studies with a total number of 1569 MCI patients followed for conversion to dementia. Four studies assessed the role of baseline scores of the MMSE in conversion from MCI to all-cause dementia and eight studies assessed this test in conversion from MCI to Alzheimer´s disease dementia. Only one study provided information about the MMSE and conversion from MCI to vascular dementia. For conversion from MCI to dementia in general, the accuracy of baseline MMSE scores ranged from sensitivities of 23% to 76% and specificities from 40% to 94%. In relationship to conversion from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia, the accuracy of baseline MMSE scores ranged from sensitivities of 27% to 89% and specificities from 32% to 90%. Only one study provided information about conversion from MCI to vascular dementia, presenting a sensitivity of 36% and a specificity of 80% with an incidence of vascular dementia of 6.2%. Although we had planned to explore possible sources of heterogeneity, this was not undertaken due to the scarcity of studies included in our analysis. AUTHORS'

conclusionsOur review did not find evidence supporting a substantial role of MMSE as a stand-alone single-administration test in the identification of MCI patients who could develop dementia. Clinicians could prefer to request additional and extensive tests to be sure about the management of these patients. An important aspect to assess in future updates is if conversion to dementia from MCI stages could be predicted better by MMSE changes over time instead of single measurements. It is also important to assess if a set of tests, rather than an isolated one, may be more successful in predicting conversion from MCI to dementia.

Indexed as

Mental Status and Dementia TestsAlzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionDementiaDementia, VascularDisease ProgressionEarly DiagnosisFrontotemporal DementiaHumansLewy Body DiseaseNeuropsychological TestsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID34313331
PMCPMC8406467
OpenAlexW3183667033

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.