Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34314560›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2022

Risk perception, treatment adherence, and personality during COVID-19 pandemic: An international study on cancer patients.

Simone Cheli, Wendy W T Lam, Tania Estapé, Jeanette Winterling, Ozan Bahcivan, Elisabeth Andritsch, Joachim Weis, Isabel Centeno, Samantha Serpentini, Clemens Farkas and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on treatment adherence of patients with breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Motivation of patients with chronic cancer during COVID-19: a qualitative analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Simone CheliSchool of Human Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0432-3769
Wendy W T LamFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Jockey Club Institute of Cancer Care, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2383-0149
Tania EstapéFEFOC Fundació, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9792-2586
Jeanette WinterlingComprehensive Cancer Centre, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4165-9015
Ozan BahcivanOZ Psychology Family Counselling Centre, Izmir, Turkey.
Elisabeth AndritschMedical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Joachim WeisMedical Faculty Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Clinic Centre, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8646-6607
Isabel CentenoFundación Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, San Pedro Garza García, Mexico.
Samantha SerpentiniVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0517-3416
Clemens FarkasMedical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Yvonne WengströmComprehensive Cancer Centre, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Luisa FiorettoDipartimento Oncologico, USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.
Lea BaiderAssuta Medical Center, Oncology Institute, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Cherry C L LamFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Jockey Club Institute of Cancer Care, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Gil GoldzweigThe Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Tel-Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-1627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the role of personality traits in moderating the relation between COVID-19 risk perception and treatment adherence, and between risk perception and psychosocial distress in patients diagnosed with cancer.

methodsAn online survey (n = 1281) was conducted worldwide in seven countries (Austria, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey). Inclusion criteria were to be 18 years of age or older, have received a cancer diagnosis, and be in treatment or follow-up. A few moderated regression models were performed with both personality traits and Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology super-spectra as moderators.

resultsDetachment, negative affectivity, psychoticism and all the super-spectra significantly moderated the relation between coronavirus risk perception and psychosocial distress, after the adjusting effect of confidence in safeguards. Only negative affectivity moderated the association between coronavirus risk perception and treatment adherence.

conclusionsPersonality traits may foster the understanding of how a patient might adjust to cancer treatment and, more generically, to highly stressful events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is needed to confirm the results in different cancer stages and types.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultHumansPandemicsPerceptionPersonalitySARS-CoV-2Treatment Adherence and Compliancealternative model of personality disordersAMPDcancerCOVID-19hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathologyHiTOPpersonalitypsycho-oncologytraitstreatment adherence

Identifiers

PMID34314560
PMCPMC8420575

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.