ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2022
Tissue response, macrophage phenotype, and intrinsic calcification induced by cardiovascular biomaterials: Can clinical regenerative potential be predicted in a rat subcutaneous implant model?
Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual itaconate delivery systems modulate macrophage Acod1-Hif-1α-glycolysis axis for immunotherapy of bioprosthetic heart valve calcification.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Preparation and evaluation of a small-diameter vascular graft with dual anticoagulant and anticalcification functions.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Living plastics from plasticizer-assisted thermal molding of silk protein.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Histological assessment of a novel restorative coronary artery bypass graft in a chronic ovine model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Electrospun fiber-based immune engineering in regenerative medicine.Smart medicine · 2024Review
- Strategies for Development of Synthetic Heart Valve Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.Progress in materials science · 2023Article
- Immunomodulatory contribution of mast cells to the regenerative biomaterial microenvironment.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Pediatric pulmonary valve replacements: Clinical challenges and emerging technologies.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- The effect of chronic kidney disease on tissue formation ofAPL bioengineering · 2023Article
- Designing Biocompatible Tissue Engineered Heart Valves In Situ: JACC Review Topic of the Week.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023Review
- Article
- Interdisciplinary Methods for Zoonotic Tissue Acellularization for Natural Heart Valve Substitute of Biomimetic Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The host immune response to an implanted biomaterial, particularly the phenotype of infiltrating macrophages, is a key determinant of biocompatibility and downstream remodeling outcome. The present study used a subcutaneous rat model to compare the tissue response, including macrophage phenotype, remodeling potential, and calcification propensity of a biologic scaffold composed of glutaraldehyde-fixed bovine pericardium (GF-BP), the standard of care for heart valve replacement, with those of an electrospun polycarbonate-based supramolecular polymer scaffold (ePC-UPy), urinary bladder extracellular matrix (UBM-ECM), and a polypropylene mesh (PP). The ePC-UPy and UBM-ECM materials induced infiltration of mononuclear cells throughout the thickness of the scaffold within 2 days and neovascularization at 14 days. GF-BP and PP elicited a balance of pro-inflammatory (M1-like) and anti-inflammatory (M2-like) macrophages, while UBM-ECM and ePC-UPy supported a dominant M2-like macrophage phenotype at all timepoints. Relative to GF-BP, ePC-UPy was markedly less susceptible to calcification for the 180 day duration of the study. UBM-ECM induced an archetypical constructive remodeling response dominated by M2-like macrophages and the PP caused a typical foreign body reaction dominated by M1-like macrophages. The results of this study highlight the divergent macrophage and host remodeling response to biomaterials with distinct physical and chemical properties and suggest that the rat subcutaneous implantation model can be used to predict in vivo biocompatibility and regenerative potential for clinical application of cardiovascular biomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.