Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34326370›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2021

Sociodemographic characteristics of missing data in digital phenotyping.

Mathew V Kiang, Jarvis T Chen, Nancy Krieger, Caroline O Buckee, Monica J Alexander, Justin T Baker, Randy L Buckner, Garth Coombs, Janet W Rich-Edwards, Kenzie W Carlson and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparing training window selection methods for prediction in non-stationary time series.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mathew V KiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jarvis T ChenDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Nancy KriegerDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Caroline O BuckeeDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Monica J AlexanderDepartment of Sociology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Justin T BakerDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Randy L BucknerDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Garth CoombsDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Janet W Rich-EdwardsDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Kenzie W CarlsonDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jukka-Pekka OnnelaDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. onnela@hsph.harvard.edu.

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
Robust Predictors of Mania and PsychosisU01MH116925 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI BAKER, JUSTIN T, RAUCH, SCOTT L · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
Using mobile phones for social and behavioral sensing of mood disorder patientsDP2MH103909 · NIMH · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI ONNELA, JUKKA-PEKKA · 2013 to 2013
$2.4M
Advanced Multimodal Neuroimaging Training GrantT90DA022759 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2006 to 2015
$1.4M
Reducing racial disparities in the treatment of opioid use disorder using machine learning-based causal analysisK99DA051534 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KIANG, MATHEW VINHHOA · 2020 to 2021
$359k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA051534NIDA NIH HHS T90 DA022759NIMH NIH HHS DP2 MH103909NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH116925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ubiquity of smartphones, with their increasingly sophisticated array of sensors, presents an unprecedented opportunity for researchers to collect longitudinal, diverse, temporally-dense data about human behavior while minimizing participant burden. Researchers increasingly make use of smartphones for "digital phenotyping," the collection and analysis of raw phone sensor and log data to study the lived experiences of subjects in their natural environments using their own devices. While digital phenotyping has shown promise in fields such as psychiatry and neuroscience, there are fundamental gaps in our knowledge about data collection and non-collection (i.e., missing data) in smartphone-based digital phenotyping. In this meta-study using individual-level data from six different studies, we examined accelerometer and GPS sensor data of 211 participants, amounting to 29,500 person-days of observation, using Bayesian hierarchical negative binomial regression with study- and user-level random intercepts. Sensitivity analyses including alternative model specification and stratified models were conducted. We found that iOS users had lower GPS non-collection than Android users. For GPS data, rates of non-collection did not differ by race/ethnicity, education, age, or gender. For accelerometer data, Black participants had higher rates of non-collection, but rates did not differ by sex, education, or age. For both sensors, non-collection increased by 0.5% to 0.9% per week. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using smartphone-based digital phenotyping across diverse populations, for extended periods of time, and within diverse cohorts. As smartphones become increasingly embedded in everyday life, the insights of this study will help guide the design, planning, and analysis of digital phenotyping studies.

Indexed as

Geographic Information SystemsSociological FactorsAccelerometryAdolescentAdultBayes TheoremBlack PeopleChildCognitionData CollectionEnvironmentFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID34326370
PMCPMC8322366

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.