Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34327626›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021

Software-Based Method for Automated Segmentation and Measurement of Wounds on Photographs Using Mask R-CNN: a Validation Study.

Maxim Privalov, Nils Beisemann, Jan El Barbari, Eric Mandelka, Michael Müller, Hannah Syrek, Paul Alfred Grützner, Sven Yves Vetter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maxim PrivalovBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
Nils BeisemannBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
Jan El BarbariBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
Eric MandelkaBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
Michael MüllerMbits Imaging GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hannah SyrekMbits Imaging GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Paul Alfred GrütznerBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
Sven Yves VetterBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany. sven.vetter@bgu-ludwigshafen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8024-9276

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical routine, wound documentation is one of the most important contributing factors to treating patients with acute or chronic wounds. The wound documentation process is currently very time-consuming, often examiner-dependent, and therefore imprecise. This study aimed to validate a software-based method for automated segmentation and measurement of wounds on photographic images using the Mask R-CNN (Region-based Convolutional Neural Network). During the validation, five medical experts manually segmented an independent dataset with 35 wound photographs at two different points in time with an interval of 1 month. Simultaneously, the dataset was automatically segmented using the Mask R-CNN. Afterwards, the segmentation results were compared, and intra- and inter-rater analyses performed. In the statistical evaluation, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out and dice coefficients were calculated. The ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences throughout all raters and the network in the first segmentation round (F = 1.424 and p > 0.228) and the second segmentation round (F = 0.9969 and p > 0.411). The repeated measure analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the segmentation quality of the medical experts over time (F = 6.05 and p > 0.09). However, a certain intra-rater variability was apparent, whereas the Mask R-CNN consistently provided identical segmentations regardless of the point in time. Using the software-based method for segmentation and measurement of wounds on photographs can accelerate the documentation process and improve the consistency of measured values while maintaining quality and precision.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSoftwareHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedConvolutional neural networksMedical image processingWound measurementWound segmentation

Identifiers

PMID34327626
PMCPMC8455799

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.