Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331614›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022

Safety and tolerability of regadenoson in comparison with adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Data from a multicentre prospective registry.

Jose V Monmeneu Menadas, Maria P García Gonzalez, Maria P Lopez-Lereu, Laura Higueras Ortega, Alicia M Maceira Gonzalez

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic Value of Regadenoson Stress Perfusion CMR.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Safety of dobutamine or adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with left ventricular thrombus.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Safety, feasibility, and hemodynamic response of regadenoson for stress perfusion CMR.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jose V Monmeneu MenadasCardiovascular Unit, ASCIRES Biomedical Group, C/Marqués de San Juan, 6, 46015, Valencia, Spain. jmonmeneu@eresa.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1271-0520
Maria P García GonzalezCardiovascular Unit, ASCIRES Biomedical Group, C/Marqués de San Juan, 6, 46015, Valencia, Spain.
Maria P Lopez-LereuCardiovascular Unit, ASCIRES Biomedical Group, C/Marqués de San Juan, 6, 46015, Valencia, Spain.
Laura Higueras OrtegaCardiovascular Unit, ASCIRES Biomedical Group, C/Marqués de San Juan, 6, 46015, Valencia, Spain.
Alicia M Maceira GonzalezCardiovascular Unit, ASCIRES Biomedical Group, C/Marqués de San Juan, 6, 46015, Valencia, Spain.
Endesa (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the feasibility and incidence of immediate complications of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with regadenoson in comparison with adenosine in a large referral population. This is a large, multicenter, prospective registry of vasodilator stress-CMR in a referral population. We recorded the clinical and demographic data, quality of test, CMR findings, hemodynamic data, and complications. Between January 2016 and July 2019, 2908 patients underwent stress-CMR, 2253 with regadenoson and 655 with adenosine. 25.1% of patients had previously known coronary artery disease (CAD). In 305 patients regadenoson was used due to presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma, while in 1948 subjects regadenoson was used as first-line vasodilator. Quality was optimal in 90.0%, suboptimal in 9.5%, and poor in 0.5%. Images were diagnostic in 98.9%. After stress with regadenoson, aminophylline 200 mg was administered intravenously in all patients. No patient died or had severe immediate complications with regadenoson as opposed to 2 severe bronchospasm with adenosine (p = 0.05). 11 patients (0.5%) had non-severe complications with regadenoson and five patients (0.8%) with adenosine (p = n.s.). Only two patients (0.088%) had non-severe bronchospasm after regadenoson administration. All complications were solved in the CMR unit, with no need for further specific care. Factors significantly associated with presence of complications were history of COPD or asthma and detection of inducible ischaemia. Patients had significantly more minor symptoms when adenosine was used (66.0% vs. 18.4%, p < 0.0001). Stress-CMR with regadenoson is feasible, providing diagnostic information in a referral population. Regadenoson had an excellent safety profile and better tolerability than adenosine, with no serious immediate complications and low incidence of non-severe complications. Only inducible ischaemia and previous history of COPD or asthma were associated with complications after regadenoson-CMR. The incidence of minor symptoms was low.

Indexed as

AdenosineMyocardial Perfusion ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPredictive Value of TestsPurinesPyrazolesRegistriesVasodilator AgentsAdenosinePurinesPyrazolesregadenosonVasodilator AgentsCardiovascular magnetic resonanceFeasibilityRegadenosonRegistrySafety

Identifiers

PMID34331614
OpenAlexW3183437470

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.