Trial reportBMC cardiovascular disorders2021
Effects of a pharmaceutical care intervention on clinical outcomes and patient adherence in coronary heart disease: the MIMeRiC randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02102503 (Motivational Interviewing and Medication Review in the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Motivational Interviewing and Medication Review in the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the impact of pharmacists in outpatient mental health settings: a systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Pooled it
- Pharmacist interventions to improve hypertension management among patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Methods and validity indicators for measuring adherence and persistence to aspirin in secondary cardiovascular prevention: a systematic review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review investigating the role and impact of pharmacist interventions in cardiac rehabilitation.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Pooled it
- The Efficacy of Rosuvastatin, Amlodipine, and Aspirin in the Treatment of Hypertension with Coronary Heart Disease and Its Effect on Platelet Aggregation.Disease markers · 2022Trial
- A Systematic Review of Pharmacists Using Motivational Interviewing and Patient Outcomes.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of a pharmacist adherence intervention on medication beliefs and drug-related problems in coronary patients - a process evaluation of the MIMeRiC trial.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Building on the 2025 National Academies Pharmacy Workshop: health systems financially supported pharmacist roles.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Research status and trends of pharmaceutical care in hospitals from an international perspective (1990-2024): A bibliometric analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Implementation Gaps in Public Outpatient Drug Programs: A Survey of Physicians in Urban Primary Care in Kazakhstan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Pharmacist-Led Transition of Care Services in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Scoping Review.Cardiology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Quality Use of Medicines (QUM) Programs and Strategies in Saudi Arabia: A Narrative Review.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2025Review
- Impact of a clinical pharmacy intervention on medication adherence and the quality use of medicines in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a single centre nonrandomised controlled clinical trial.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Pharmacists delivering hypertension care services: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Conceptual model of pharmaceutical care for patients with coronary heart disease and comorbid conditions in Ukraine.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Improving medication adherence in cardiovascular disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024Review
- Designing and psychometric evaluation of pharmacists' attitude toward ethical challenges questionnaire in pharmacy practice: A mixed‑method study.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2023Article
- Patients' Beliefs About Their Cardiovascular Medications After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study.CJC open · 2023Article
- Comprehensive Medication Management Services with a Holistic Point of View, a Scoping Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Impact of continuous pharmaceutical care led by clinical pharmacists during transitions of care on medication adherence and clinical outcomes for patients with coronary heart disease: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the treatment of coronary heart disease, secondary prevention goals are still often unmet and poor adherence to prescribed drugs has been suggested as one of the reasons. We aimed to investigate whether pharmaceutical care by a pharmacist at the cardiology clinic trained in motivational interviewing improves clinical outcomes and patient adherence.
methodsThis was a prospective, randomized, controlled, outcomes-blinded trial designed to compare pharmaceutical care follow-up with standard care. After standard follow-up at the cardiology clinic, patients in the intervention group were seen by a clinical pharmacist two to five times as required over seven months. Pharmacists were trained to use motivational interviewing in the consultations and they tailored their support to each patient's clinical needs and beliefs about medicines. The primary study end-point was the proportion of patients who reached the treatment goal for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 12 months after discharge. The key secondary outcome was patient adherence to lipid-lowering therapy at 15 months after discharge, and other secondary outcomes were the effects on patient adherence to other preventive drugs, systolic blood pressure, disease-specific quality of life, and healthcare use.
results316 patients were included. The proportion of patients who reached the target for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were 37.0% in the intervention group and 44.2% in the control group (P = .263). More intervention than control patients were adherent to cholesterol-lowering drugs (88 vs 77%; P = .033) and aspirin (97 vs 91%; P = .036) but not to beta-blocking agents or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors.
conclusionsOur intervention had no positive effects on risk factors for CHD, but it increased patient adherence. Further investigation of the intervention process is needed to explore the difference in results between patient adherence and medication effects. Longer follow-up of healthcare use and mortality will determine if the increased adherence per se eventually will have a meaningful effect on patient health.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02102503, 03/04/2014 retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.