Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34334261›Full record

ReviewChinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi2022

STING1 in sepsis: Mechanisms, functions, and implications.

Ruo-Xi Zhang, Rui Kang, Dao-Lin Tang

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Immune aging and infectious diseases.Chinese medical journal · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Mechanisms of alkaliptosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruo-Xi ZhangDepartment of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Rui KangDepartment of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Dao-Lin TangDepartment of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. Electronic address: daolin.tang@utsouthwestern.edu.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USSouthwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening clinical syndrome and one of the most challenging health problems in the world. Pathologically, sepsis and septic shock are caused by a dysregulated host immune response to infection, which can eventually lead to multiple organ failure and even death. As an adaptor transporter between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus, stimulator of interferon response cGAMP interactor 1 (STING1, also known as STING or TMEM173) has been found to play a vital role at the intersection of innate immunity, inflammation, autophagy, and cell death in response to invading microbial pathogens or endogenous host damage. There is ample evidence that impaired STING1, through its immune and non-immune functions, is involved in the pathological process of sepsis. In this review, we discuss the regulation and function of the STING1 pathway in sepsis and highlight it as a suitable drug target for the treatment of lethal infection.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticAutophagyHumansImmunity, InnateMultiple Organ FailureCell deathImmunityInflammationSepsisSTING1

Identifiers

PMID34334261
PMCPMC8787237
OpenAlexW3185244616

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.