Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34343563›Full record

ArticleUrology2021

Immediate Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) Reactivation at the Time of Urethral Cuff Exchange is Not Associated with Increased Erosion Rate.

Matthew J Rabinowitz, Nora M Haney, James L Liu, Hasan Dani, Andrew J Cohen, E James Wright

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew J Rabinowitz
Nora M Haney
James L Liu
Hasan Dani
Andrew J Cohen
E James Wright

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of immediate artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) reactivation in patients after urethral cuff replacement. It is common practice to delay reactivation of an AUS for four to six weeks following surgery to replace a failed urethral cuff. This is due to concerns about local tissue edema risking obstruction and concerns for urethral erosion. Despite these concerns, there are no published data to support this practice.

methodsRetrospective chart review of single surgeon procedures performed from 2005-2020. Patients with urethral cuff replacement for recurrent stress incontinence due to compression or mechanical failure were included.

resultsThirty-four patients were identified who had immediate reactivation of the AUS following urethral cuff exchange. Thirty of these patients (88.2%) had radical prostatectomy and five patients also underwent further radiation therapy (14.7%). At 6 months follow-up, there was no reported events of erosion. Likewise, 32/34 (94%) of patients had no complications and reported expected urinary function of the AUS. Urinary retention was not observed. One patient required further re-exploration for a complication within his AUS system (2.9%), and another was ultimately unsatisfied with their unchanged baseline continence despite a fully functioning AUS (2.9%).

conclusionIn this series, we observe that immediate reactivation of the AUS after urethral cuff exchange is a safe and reasonable management approach. Limitations of this analysis include a single institution, retrospective study. However, early AUS reactivation after device revision has not been reported in the literature and warrants further investigation given the impact on patient quality of life.

Indexed as

Prosthesis FailureUrinary Sphincter, ArtificialAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUrethraUrinary Incontinence, Stress

Identifiers

PMID34343563
OpenAlexW3190584196

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.