Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34354591›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2021

Phytochemicals as Potential Chemopreventive and Chemotherapeutic Agents for Emerging Human Papillomavirus-Driven Head and Neck Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Prospects.

Nikita Aggarwal, Joni Yadav, Suhail Chhakara, Divya Janjua, Tanya Tripathi, Apoorva Chaudhary, Arun Chhokar, Kulbhushan Thakur, Tejveer Singh, Alok Chandra Bharti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Molecular pathways modulated by phytochemicals in head and neck cancer.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikita AggarwalMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Joni YadavMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Suhail ChhakaraMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Divya JanjuaMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Tanya TripathiMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Apoorva ChaudharyMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Arun ChhokarMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Kulbhushan ThakurMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Tejveer SinghMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Alok Chandra BhartiMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
University of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and neck cancer (HNC) usually arises from squamous cells of the upper aerodigestive tract that line the mucosal surface in the head and neck region. In India, HNC is common in males, and it is the sixth most common cancer globally. Conventionally, HNC attributes to the use of alcohol or chewing tobacco. Over the past four decades, portions of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive HNC are increasing at an alarming rate. Identification based on the etiological factors and molecular signatures demonstrates that these neoplastic lesions belong to a distinct category that differs in pathological characteristics and therapeutic response. Slow development in HNC therapeutics has resulted in a low 5-year survival rate in the last two decades. Interestingly, HPV-positive HNC has shown better outcomes following conservative treatments and immunotherapies. This raises demand to have a pre-therapy assessment of HPV status to decide the treatment strategy. Moreover, there is no HPV-specific treatment for HPV-positive HNC patients. Accumulating evidence suggests that phytochemicals are promising leads against HNC and show potential as adjuvants to chemoradiotherapy in HNC. However, only a few of these phytochemicals target HPV. The aim of the present article was to collate data on various leading phytochemicals that have shown promising results in the prevention and treatment of HNC in general and HPV-driven HNC. The review explores the possibility of using these leads against HPV-positive tumors as some of the signaling pathways are common. The review also addresses various challenges in the field that prevent their use in clinical settings.

Indexed as

head and neck cancerhuman pappillomavirusphytochemicalspreventionsmokingtherapeuticstobacco

Identifiers

PMID34354591
PMCPMC8329252
OpenAlexW3189392650

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.