Evidence mapPaperPMID 34358247Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Evaluating the antidiabetic effects of R-verapamil in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus mouse models.

Yu-Syuan Chen, Shao-Ju Weng, Shu-Hsien Chang, Rou-Ying Li, Guang-Tzuu Shane, Jui-Pao Hsu, Sheng-Wen Yeh, Ai-Ching Chang, Meng-Ju Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yu-Syuan ChenCenter Laboratories Inc., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Shao-Ju WengLumosa Therapeutics Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Shu-Hsien ChangLumosa Therapeutics Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.ORCID 0000-0003-4915-0395
Rou-Ying LiCenter Laboratories Inc., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Guang-Tzuu ShaneCenter Laboratories Inc., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Jui-Pao HsuCenter Laboratories Inc., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Sheng-Wen YehLumosa Therapeutics Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Ai-Ching ChangCenter Laboratories Inc., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Meng-Ju LeeCenter Laboratories Inc., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing. Types 1 and 2 DM are associated with declining β-cell function. Verapamil (50% S-verapamil and 50% R-verapamil) can treat DM by downregulating thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP), which induces islet β-cell apoptosis. However, it may also induce cardiovascular side effects as S-verapamil is negatively inotropic. In contrast, R-verapamil only weakly induces adverse cardiac effects. In this study, we aimed to determine the antidiabetic efficacy and cardiovascular safety of R-verapamil. We examined R- and S-verapamil binding through in vitro studies. Streptozotocin-induced type 1 and db/db type 2 DM mouse models were used to assess the antidiabetic efficacy of verapamil. IL-6, blood glucose (BG), Txnip expression, and β-cells were evaluated in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice, while body weight, BG, and serum insulin were measured in the db/db mice. In the type 1 DM study, 100 mg/kg/day R-verapamil and racemic verapamil lowered BG, downregulated Txnip expression, and reduced β-cell apoptosis. In the type 2 DM study, the optimal R-verapamil dosage was 60 mg/kg/day and it lowered BG and raised serum insulin. However, efficacy did not increase with R-verapamil dosage. R-verapamil combined with metformin/acarbose improved BG and serum insulin more effectively than metformin/acarbose alone or verapamil combined with acarbose. R-verapamil had weaker cardiovascular side effects than S-verapamil. R-verapamil was 9.0× and 3.4× less effective than S-verapamil at inhibiting atrial inotropy and ileal contractility, respectively. It was also 8.7× weaker than S-verapamil as an agonist of somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2), inhibiting ileal neurogenic contraction. Hence, R-verapamil may be an optimal DM treatment as it is safe, improves glycemic control, and preserves β-cell function both as monotherapy and in combination with metformin or acarbose. R-Verapamil has potential for delaying or arresting DM progression and improving patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypoglycemic AgentsVerapamilAnimalsApoptosisBlood GlucoseDisease Models, AnimalInsulin-Secreting CellsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsVerapamil

Identifiers

PMID34358247
PMCPMC8345870
OpenAlexW3192773171

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.