ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2022
Association of mid-trimester maternal angiogenic biomarkers with small-for-gestational-age infants in an urban Zambian cohort: a nested case-control study.
Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between peripheral markers in women with malaria in pregnancy and small newborns: A cross-sectional study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Association of mid-trimester maternal angiogenic biomarkers with small-for-gestational-age infants in an urban Zambian cohort: a nested case-control study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether angiogenic biomarker concentrations differ between women who deliver small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants (<10th centile birth weight for gestational age) compared with controls, because identifying SGA risk early could improve outcomes.
methodsThis case-control study compared serum concentrations of angiogenic biomarkers before 24 weeks of pregnancy from 62 women who delivered SGA infants (cases) and 62 control women from an urban Zambian cohort. Odds of delivering an SGA infant were calculated using conditional logistic regression.
resultsPlacental growth factor (PlGF), soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase (sFLT-1) and soluble endoglin (sEng) in controls were 37.74 pg/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 23.12-63.15), 2525.18 pg/mL (IQR 1502.21-4265.54) and 2408.18 pg/mL (IQR 1854.87-3017.94), respectively. SGA cases had higher PlGF (40.50 pg/mL, IQR 22.81-67.94) and sFLT-1 (2613.06 pg/mL, IQR 1720.58-3722.50), and lower sEng (2038.06 pg/mL, IQR 1445.25-3372.26). Participants with sEng concentration below and concomitant sFLT-1 concentration above their respective thresholds (n = 40) had five-fold higher odds of SGA (adjusted odds ratio 4.77, 95% confidence interval 1.61-14.1; P = 0.005).
conclusionBiomarker concentrations were similar between cases and controls. Participants with concomitant low sEng and high sFLT-1 had the highest odds of SGA, suggesting that a combination of biomarkers may better for predicting SGA than single biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.