Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34363071›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2021

Genome-wide and sister chromatid-resolved profiling of protein occupancy in replicated chromatin with ChOR-seq and SCAR-seq.

Nataliya Petryk, Nazaret Reverón-Gómez, Cristina González-Aguilera, Maria Dalby, Robin Andersson, Anja Groth

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Epigenetic determinants of fusion-driven sarcomas: paradigms and challenges.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nataliya Petryk *Epigenetics and Cell Fate Centre, UMR7216 CNRS, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8629-1475
Nazaret Reverón-Gómez *Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research (CPR), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7347-781X
Cristina González-Aguilera *Andalusian Centre for Molecular Biology and Regenerative Medicine (CABIMER), University of Seville-CSIC-University Pablo de Olavide, Andalusian Government, Seville, Spain.
Maria DalbyThe Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Robin AnderssonThe Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1516-879X
Anja GrothNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research (CPR), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. anja.groth@cpr.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-0577-1771
University of Copenhagen · DKCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidating the mechanisms underlying chromatin maintenance upon genome replication is critical for the understanding of how gene expression programs and cell identity are preserved across cell divisions. Here, we describe two recently developed techniques, chromatin occupancy after replication (ChOR)-seq and sister chromatids after replication (SCAR)-seq, that profile chromatin occupancy on newly replicated DNA in mammalian cells in 5 d of bench work. Both techniques share a common strategy that includes pulse labeling of newly synthesized DNA and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), followed by purification and high-throughput sequencing. Whereas ChOR-seq quantitatively profiles the post-replicative abundance of histone modifications and chromatin-associated proteins, SCAR-seq distinguishes chromatin occupancy between nascent sister chromatids. Together, these two complementary techniques have unraveled key mechanisms controlling the inheritance of modified histones during replication and revealed locus-specific dynamics of histone modifications across the cell cycle. Here, we provide the experimental protocols and bioinformatic pipelines for these methods.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesAnimalsChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNA ReplicationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansChromatin

Identifiers

PMID34363071
OpenAlexW3193018563

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.