Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34364395›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2021

Prevalence of hypertension in Ghanaian society: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment.

Fidelis Atibila, Gill Ten Hoor, Emmanuel Timmy Donkoh, Abdul Iddrisu Wahab, Gerjo Kok

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. May Measurement Month 2022: an analysis of blood pressure screening results from Ghana.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fidelis AtibilaValley View University, Box 183, Techiman, Ghana. fidelisatibila2013@gmail.com.
Gill Ten HoorDepartment of Works and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, UNS40, 4755, Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Emmanuel Timmy DonkohDepartment of Basic and Applied Biology, University of Energy and Natural Resources, UENR, Box 214, Sunyani, Ghana. timmy.donkoh@uenr.edu.gh.
Abdul Iddrisu WahabDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Energy and Natural Resources, UENR, Box 214, Sunyani, Ghana.
Gerjo KokMaastricht University, UNS40A4.732, Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLUniversity of Energy and Natural Resources · GHValley View University · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension has become an important public health concern in the developing world owing to rising prevalence and its adverse impact on ailing health systems. Despite being a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, hypertension has not received the needed attention in Ghana as a result of various competing interests for scarce health resources. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a comprehensive and updated summary of the literature on the prevalence of hypertension in Ghana.

methodsMajor databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar and local thesis repositories were accessed to identify population-based studies on hypertension among Ghanaians. Data extracted from retrieved reports were screened independently by two reviewers. The quality of eligible studies was evaluated and reported. A reliable pooled estimate of hypertension prevalence was calculated utilizing a random-effects model and reported according to the GRADE framework. Additionally, a meta-regression analysis was performed to analyze the contribution of study-level variables to variance in hypertension prevalence.

resultsIn general, a total of 45,470 subjects (n = 22,866 males and 22,604 females) were enrolled from urban (n = 12), rural (n = 8), and mixed populations (n = 7). Blood pressure (BP) was measured across studies according to a validated and clinically approved protocol by trained field workers or healthcare workers including nurses and physicians. A combined total of 30,033 participants across twenty studies reporting on the population prevalence of hypertension were pooled with 10,625 (35.4%) identified to satisfy study criteria for elevated BP. The pooled prevalence across 24 studies was 30.3% (95% CI 26.1-34.8%) after fitting a random effects model. Prevalence of hypertension was 30.1% (95% CI 25.6-36.0%) among females and 34.0% (95% CI 28.5-40.0%) among males. Significant differences in pooled estimates across regions emerged from subgroup comparisons of regional estimates with an increasing trend in the north-to-south direction and with increasing age. Compared to rural settings, the burden of hypertension in urban populations was significantly higher. Age structure and population type accounted for 65.0% of the observed heterogeneity in hypertension estimates.

conclusionsThe prevalence of hypertension in Ghana is still high. The gap in hypertension prevalence between rural and urban populations is closing especially in elderly populations. These findings must claim the attention of public health authorities in Ghana to explore opportunities to reduce rural hypertension. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol for this review has been published previously with PROSPERO ( CRD42020215829 ).

Indexed as

GRADE ApproachHypertensionAgedBlood PressureFemaleGhanaHumansMalePrevalenceBlood pressureCardiovascular riskGhanaHypertensionPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID34364395
PMCPMC8349493
OpenAlexW3189662305

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.