Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34366807›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2021

Clinically Used Hormone Formulations Differentially Impact Memory, Anxiety-Like, and Depressive-Like Behaviors in a Rat Model of Transitional Menopause.

Stephanie V Koebele, Ryoko Hiroi, Zachary M T Plumley, Ryan Melikian, Alesia V Prakapenka, Shruti Patel, Catherine Carson, Destiney Kirby, Sarah E Mennenga, Loretta P Mayer and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie V KoebeleDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Ryoko HiroiDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Zachary M T PlumleyDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Ryan MelikianDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Alesia V PrakapenkaDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Shruti PatelDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Catherine CarsonDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Destiney KirbyDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Sarah E MennengaDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Loretta P MayerFYXX Foundation, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Cheryl A DyerFYXX Foundation, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Heather A Bimonte-NelsonDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Arizona Alzheimer’s ConsortiumAlzheimer's Association · USArizona State University · US

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG019610 · NIA · SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2001 to 2020
$32.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072980 · NIA · BANNER HEALTH · PI ALIREZA ATRI · 2021 to 2026
$24.9M
Variations in Hormone Therapy: Effects on Cognition and Markers of Brain AgingR01AG028084 · NIA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BIMONTE-NELSON, HEATHER ALLYSON · 2007 to 2022
$4.7M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG019610NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072980NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved hormone therapy options are currently used to successfully alleviate unwanted symptoms associated with the changing endogenous hormonal milieu that occurs in midlife with menopause. Depending on the primary indication for treatment, different hormone therapy formulations are utilized, including estrogen-only, progestogen-only, or combined estrogen plus progestogen options. There is little known about how these formulations, or their unique pharmacodynamics, impact neurobiological processes. Seemingly disparate pre-clinical and clinical findings regarding the cognitive effects of hormone therapies, such as the negative effects associated with conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate vs. naturally circulating 17β-estradiol (E2) and progesterone, signal a critical need to further investigate the neuro-cognitive impact of hormone therapy formulations. Here, utilizing a rat model of transitional menopause, we administered either E2, progesterone, levonorgestrel, or combinations of E2 with progesterone or with levonorgestrel daily to follicle-depleted, middle-aged rats. A battery of assessments, including spatial memory, anxiety-like behaviors, and depressive-like behaviors, as well as endocrine status and ovarian follicle complement, were evaluated. Results indicate divergent outcomes for memory, anxiety, and depression, as well as unique physiological profiles, that were dependent upon the hormone regimen administered. Overall, the combination hormone treatments had the most consistently favorable profile for the domains evaluated in rats that had undergone experimentally induced transitional menopause and remained ovary-intact. The collective results underscore the importance of investigating variations in hormone therapy formulation as well as the menopause background upon which these formulations are delivered.

Indexed as

anxietydepressionestrogenlevonorgestrelmemorymenopauseprogesteroneVCD

Identifiers

PMID34366807
PMCPMC8335488
OpenAlexW3186741039

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.