Evidence mapPaperPMID 34374145Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2022

Smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women attending treatment for substance use disorders: A systematic review.

Melissa A Jackson, Amanda L Baker, Gillian S Gould, Amanda L Brown, Adrian J Dunlop, Kristen McCarter

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa A JacksonDrug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Health Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1491-6218
Amanda L BakerSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-7146
Gillian S GouldSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8489-2576
Amanda L BrownDrug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Health Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0405-0713
Adrian J DunlopDrug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Health Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2394-5966
Kristen McCarterSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2638-6381
Hunter New England Local Health District · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsUp to 95% of pregnant women seeking treatment for alcohol and other drug (AOD) use smoke tobacco. Previous reviews indicate few effective smoking cessation treatments for this group. This updated review aimed to identify and measure the efficacy of smoking cessation interventions trialled among pregnant women in AOD treatment settings who smoke tobacco.

methodsA narrative synthesis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Studies involving psychological, behavioural or pharmacological interventions used to treat tobacco use, including electronic nicotine delivery systems, for pregnant women of any age, who smoked tobacco and were seeking/receiving treatment, or in post-treatment recovery for AOD concerns, were reviewed. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and ProQuest databases, grey literature and reference lists were searched, and field experts were contacted for unpublished study data. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool assessed study quality. The review was pre-registered with PROSPERO no. CRD42018108777.

resultsSeven interventions (two randomised controlled trials, two single-arm pilot studies, two program evaluations and one causal comparative study) treating 875 women were identified. All were United States (US)-based and targeted women with drug dependence, but not alcohol dependence. Three interventions used contingency management, five provided behavioural counselling, and one offered nicotine replacement therapy. All reported reductions in cigarette consumption; one contingency management-based study demonstrated higher abstinence rates compared with controls at treatment-end that were not maintained at follow-up. Four of six studies were rated as methodologically weak and one unpublished study was not rated.

conclusionsConclusions about the efficacy of smoking interventions for pregnant women with alcohol and other drug concerns who also smoke tobacco are hindered by the paucity of available data and poor methodological quality of included studies.

Indexed as

AlcoholismSmoking CessationSubstance-Related DisordersBehavior TherapyFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTobacco Use Cessation DevicesUnited Statesalcohol and other drugsinterventionspregnancysmokingsmoking cessationsubstance use disordersystematic reviewtobaccotreatment

Identifiers

PMID34374145
PMCPMC9293139
OpenAlexW3190501216

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.