Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34375750›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM2021

Obstetrical outcomes and follow-up for patients with asymptomatic COVID-19 at delivery: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Jennifer Hill, Haylea S Patrick, Cande V Ananth, Devon O'Brien, Suzanne Spernal, Rebecca Horgan, Justin S Brandt, Marlene Schwebel, Richard C Miller, Michael J Straker and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Solidifying diagnostics in SARS-CoV-2 research.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer HillDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Drs Hill, Patrick, and Brandt, Ms Schwebel, and Dr Rosen); Prenatal Testing Center, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hartford Hospital, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Hartford, CT (Dr Hill). Electronic address: jenn.hill.md@gmail.com.
Haylea S PatrickDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Drs Hill, Patrick, and Brandt, Ms Schwebel, and Dr Rosen).
Cande V AnanthDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Dr Ananth); Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ (Dr Ananth); The Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Dr Ananth); Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ (Dr Ananth).
Devon O'BrienDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ (Drs O'Brien and Miller).
Suzanne SpernalRobert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health, Women's Services, West Orange, NJ (Ms Spernal).
Rebecca HorganDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ (Drs Horgan and Graebe).
Justin S BrandtDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Drs Hill, Patrick, and Brandt, Ms Schwebel, and Dr Rosen).
Marlene SchwebelDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Drs Hill, Patrick, and Brandt, Ms Schwebel, and Dr Rosen).
Richard C MillerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ (Drs O'Brien and Miller).
Michael J StrakerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clara Maass Medical Center, Belleville, NJ (Dr Straker).
Robert A GraebeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ (Drs Horgan and Graebe).
Todd RosenDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Drs Hill, Patrick, and Brandt, Ms Schwebel, and Dr Rosen).
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USMonmouth Medical Center · USSaint Barnabas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversal testing for COVID-19 on admission to the labor and delivery unit identifies asymptomatic patients. Whether or not these patients are at increased risk for adverse outcomes and go on to develop clinically significant disease is uncertain.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19 presentation among pregnant patients admitted for delivery and to determine whether these patients become symptomatic or require hospital readmission after discharge. STUDY

designWe performed a multicenter, prospective cohort study of pregnant patients who delivered between 20

resultsBetween April 10, 2020, and June 15, 2020, there were 218 patients with COVID-19 at the 4 sites and 413 patients without COVID-19 at the primary site. The majority (188 [83.2%]) of patients with COVID-19 were asymptomatic. Compared with the negative controls, these asymptomatic patients were not at increased risk for obstetrical complications that may increase the risk associated with COVID-19, including gestational diabetes (8.2% vs 11.4%; risk ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-2.01) and gestational hypertension (6.1% vs 7.0%; risk ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-2.67). Postpartum follow-ups via telephone surveys revealed that these patients remained asymptomatic and had low rates of family contacts acquiring the disease, but their adherence to social distancing guidelines waned during the 2-week postpartum period. Review of inpatient and emergency department records revealed low rates of hospital readmission.

conclusionMost of the pregnant patients who screened positive for COVID-19 are asymptomatic and do not go on to develop clinically significant infection after delivery. Routine surveillance of these patients after hospital discharge appears to be sufficient.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousCOVID-19 TestingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2asymptomatic diseaseCOVID-19multicenter prospective cohort studypregnancySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34375750
PMCPMC8349406
OpenAlexW3193022430

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.