Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2021
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence between regular human insulin (rDNA origin) in 0.9% sodium chloride ready-to-use infusion 1 U/mL and 100 U/mL concentrate diluted to 1 U/mL in healthy males.
Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence between regular human insulin (rDNA origin) in 0.9% sodium chloride ready-to-use infusion 1 U/mL and 100 U/mL concentrate diluted to 1 U/mL in healthy males.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2021Trial
- Impact of setting distinct target blood glucose levels on endogenous insulin suppression and pharmacodynamics of insulin preparations.World journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- How to Achieve Sufficient Endogenous Insulin Suppression in Euglycemic Clamps Assessing the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Long-Acting Insulin Preparations Employing Healthy Volunteers.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo show pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) bioequivalence between Myxredlin, a novel, ready-to-use regular human insulin 1 U/mL formulation (BAX-HI), and Novolin R 100 U/mL concentrate diluted to 1 U/mL (NOVO-HI). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis phase 1, double-blind, randomized, two-way crossover study compared the PK and PD properties of BAX-HI and NOVO-HI. A total of 58 healthy males received 0.36 U/kg of each study drug, administered intravenously over a 6-hour period, concurrent with an 8-hour euglycaemic clamp at two treatment periods separated by a washout period of 7-10 days. The primary PK endpoint was the area under the insulin concentration-time curve at steady state (SS) measured from 300 to 360 minutes (AUC
resultsAll subjects completed the first treatment period and 54 subjects completed both treatment periods. Bioequivalence between BAX-HI and NOVO-HI was shown for the primary endpoints as the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric least-squares (LS) mean ratio for AUC
conclusionsThe study showed bioequivalence between BAX-HI and NOVO-HI in terms of PK and PD characteristics in healthy males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.