Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34403141›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2022

Evaluating the efficacy of extracted squalene from seed oil in the form of microemulsion for the treatment of COVID-19: A clinical study.

Mahmoud Ebrahimi, Nafiseh Farhadian, Ali Reza Amiri, Fatemeh Hataminia, Sara Saffar Soflaei, Mohammad Karimi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The Occurrence of Squalene in Human Milk and Infant Formula.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Antimicrobial Tear Lipids in the Ocular Surface Defense.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mahmoud EbrahimiCardiovascular Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Nafiseh FarhadianChemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9419-7435
Ali Reza AmiriEmergency Medicine Department, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Fatemeh HataminiaDepartment of Medical Nanotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sara Saffar SoflaeiDepartment of Modern Sciences & Technologies, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad KarimiEmergency Medicine Department, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRBirjand University of Medical Sciences · IRFerdowsi University of Mashhad · IRGolestan University · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of the nanostructure of squalene in the form of microemulsion on COVID-19 patients. In this blinded clinical trial, a comparison was made between the efficacy of squalene treatment and controls. A total of 30 COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency department, and the infection ward was equally allocated to case (n = 15) and control (n = 15) groups according to their age and underlying diseases. The baseline characteristics of subjects, including age, gender, time of treatment onset, underlying condition, white blood cells count, and lymphocyte count were similar (p < 0.05). Baseline laboratory tests and computed tomography (CT) scans were performed for the study groups. The treatment group received 5 mg of intravenous squalene twice a day and standard treatment for 6 days, while controls received only standard treatment. After 6 days of treatment, clinical and CT scan changes were evaluated and compared in intervention and control groups. The need for oxygen therapy (p = 0.020), 2 days of no fever (p = 0.025), cough alleviation (p = 0.010), and lung high-resolution computed tomography improvement (p = 0.033) were significantly different between cases and controls within 7 days of admission. No adverse effects were observed in the treatment group. Our data suggest that squalene could be considered as a potential treatment for COVID-19, and further studies are required to confirm the results.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntiviral AgentsEmulsionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlant OilsSqualeneTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsEmulsionsPlant OilsSqualeneclinical studyCOVID-19inflammationmicroemulsionpumpkin seed oilsqualene

Identifiers

PMID34403141
PMCPMC8427120
OpenAlexW3194940902

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.