Trial reportStroke2021
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Using Cilostazol With Aspirin or Clopidogrel: Subanalysis of the CSPS.com Trial.
Trial report in Stroke, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01995370 (Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Switching From Aspirin Monotherapy After Noncardioembolic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Stroke · 2026Pooled it
- New options for cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet therapy for ischaemic stroke prevention in East Asian populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Chinese Stroke Association guidelines for clinical management of ischaemic cerebrovascular diseases: executive summary and 2023 update.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2023Guideline
- Blood pressure during long-term cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet therapy after stroke: a post hoc analysis of the CSPS.com trial.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024Trial
- Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis.Neurology · 2022Trial
- Exploration of the Role of Cilostazol in Brugada Syndrome: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Potential, and Implications in the Prevention of Ventricular Arrhythmias.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- A disrupted adenosinergic axis facilitates platelet activation in APS: exploring a novel therapeutic target.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Article
- Unbiased high-throughput screening of drug-repurposing libraries identifies small-molecule inhibitors of clot retraction.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Association between impaired brachial flow-mediated dilation and early neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective analysis.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Mechanisms and recent advances in non-coding RNAs and RNA modifications in antiplatelet drug resistance.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Cilostazol geno-protective effects mitigate carbamazepine-induced genotoxicity in human cultured blood lymphocytes.Toxicology reports · 2024Article
- Is it effective to initiate cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet therapy before achieving blood pressure control? Lessons from the CSPS study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024Article
- Daily Antiplatelets Other Than Aspirin Reduce Liver Cancer Risk but Increase Intracranial Hemorrhage Risk in Cirrhotic Patients.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Association of perioperative P2YFrontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Elevated Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio Correlates with Incident Stroke in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Neurosurgery: Tracking Antiplatelet Response Patterns for Endovascular Intervention.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Mechanistic Protective Effect of Cilostazol in Cisplatin-Induced Testicular Damage via Regulation of Oxidative Stress and TNF-α/NF-κB/Caspase-3 Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- A Preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Behavior Testing in Mice Models of Ischemic Stroke.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Antithrombotic Therapy Improves ICU Mortality of Septic Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease.International journal of clinical practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Although dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel reduces the recurrence of ischemic stroke while significantly increasing the bleeding events compared with monotherapy, the CSPS.com trial (Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study combination) showed that DAPT using cilostazol was more effective without the bleeding risk. In the CSPS.com trial, aspirin or clopidogrel was used as the underlying antiplatelet drug. The effectiveness and safety of each combination were examined and clarified. Methods: In the CSPS.com trial, a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study, patients with high-risk, noncardioembolic ischemic stroke 8 to 180 days after onset treated with aspirin or clopidogrel alone at the discretion of the physician in charge were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either monotherapy or DAPT using cilostazol and followed for 0.5 to 3.5 years. The primary efficacy outcome was first recurrence of ischemic stroke. The safety outcome was severe or life-threatening bleeding. The analysis was based on the underlying antiplatelet agents. Results: A total of 763 patients taking aspirin and 1116 taking clopidogrel were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Although the clopidogrel group had more risk factors than the aspirin group, the primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. In the aspirin group, the primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome did not differ significantly between the DAPT group and the aspirin-monotherapy group. In the clopidogrel group, the primary end point occurred at a rate of 2.31 per 100 patient-years in the DAPT group and 5.19 per 100 patient-years in the clopidogrel-monotherapy group (hazard ratio, 0.447 [95% CI, 0.258–0.774]). Safety outcome did not differ significantly between groups (0.51 per 100 patient-years versus 0.71 per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.730 [95% CI, 0.206–2.588]). Conclusions: The combination of cilostazol and clopidogrel significantly reduced the recurrence of ischemic stroke without increasing the bleeding risk in noncardioembolic, high-risk patients. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01995370. URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000012180.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.