Trial reportJAMA dermatology2021
Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Phase 2, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 79 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Multicenter, Investigator-Blind, Subject-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
A Single-arm Open-label Study Assessing Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Adult Participants With Pyoderma Gangrenosum Over 24 Weeks
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-term efficacy of biologics in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review and NMA.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Pooled it
- "Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs".Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- European S2k guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa part 2: Treatment.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Guideline
- Management of hidradenitis suppurativa in the inpatient setting: a clinical guide.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Guideline
- Guidelines How to Integrate Surgery and Targeted Therapy with Biologics for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Delphi Consensus Statements from an Italian Expert Panel.Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Guideline
- Trial
- Secukinumab in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Pooled Pharmacokinetics and Safety Results From the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE Phase 3 Studies.International journal of dermatology · 2026Trial
- Secukinumab efficacy in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4): A post hoc analysis of the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE trials.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Trial
- Position Statement of the EADV Task Forces With External Experts on Quality of Life Measurement in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Update.International journal of dermatology · 2026Review
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Bimekizumab for Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Multicenter Retrospective Study from the Italian Landscape HS (IL-HS).Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Hidradenitis suppurativa: epidemiology, diagnosis, molecular pathogenesis and therapy.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Association Between Bimekizumab's Clinical Response and Patient-Reported Benefits on Health-Related Quality of Life: Results from BE HEARD I and II.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa and IL-17 Inhibitors: A Focus on Trials and Real-Life Data.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa in the United Arab Emirates (UAE): A Consensus Statement from the Emirates Dermatology Society.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- Unique B- and plasma cell signature differentiates hidradenitis suppurativa from psoriasis and atopic dermatitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Successful treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa with vunakizumab: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Real-World Experience with Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Severe Refractory Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Retrospective Case Series.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Effect of adalimumab treatment on lesions and inflammatory factors in patients with moderate-severe hidradenitis suppurativa.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Hidradenitis suppurativa with and without draining tunnels: A real-world study characterizing differences in treatment and disease burden.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Article
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa Treatment During Pregnancy and Lactation: Navigating Challenges.International journal of dermatology · 2025Review
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceHidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a high burden for patients and limited existing therapeutic options.
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin 17A and 17F in individuals with moderate to severe HS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial with an active reference arm was performed from September 22, 2017, to February 21, 2019. The study included a 2- to 4-week screening period, a 12-week treatment period, and a 20-week safety follow-up. Of 167 participants screened at multiple centers, 90 were enrolled. Eligible participants were 18 to 70 years of age with a diagnosis of moderate to severe HS 12 months or more before baseline.
interventionsParticipants with HS were randomized 2:1:1 to receive bimekizumab (640 mg at week 0, 320 mg every 2 weeks), placebo, or reference arm adalimumab (160 mg at week 0, 80 mg at week 2, and 40 mg every week for weeks 4-10). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The prespecified primary efficacy variable was the proportion of participants with a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count with no increase in abscess or draining fistula count (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response [HiSCR] at week 12. Exploratory variables included proportion achieving a modified HiSCR with 75% reduction of HiSCR criteria (HiSCR75) or a modified HiSCR with 90% reduction of HiSCR criteria (HiSCR90), change in Patient's Global Assessment of Pain, and Dermatology Life Quality Index total scores.
resultsEighty-eight participants received at least 1 dose of study medication (61 [69%] female; median age, 36 years; range, 18-69 years). Seventy-three participants completed the study, including safety follow-up. Bimekizumab demonstrated a higher HiSCR rate vs placebo at week 12 (57.3% vs 26.1%; posterior probability of superiority equaled 0.998, calculated using bayesian analysis). Bimekizumab demonstrated greater clinical improvements compared with placebo. Improvements in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score (IHS4) were seen at week 12 with bimekizumab (mean [SD] IHS4, 16.0 [18.0]) compared with placebo (mean [SD] IHS4, 40.2 [32.6]). More bimekizumab-treated participants achieved positive results on stringent outcome measures compared with placebo. At week 12, 46% of bimekizumab-treated participants achieved HiSCR75 and 32% achieved HiSCR90, whereas 10% of placebo-treated participants achieved HiSCR75 and none achieved HiSCR90; in adalimumab-treated participants, 35% achieved HiSCR75 and 15% achieved HiSCR90. One participant withdrew because of adverse events. Serious adverse events occurred in 2 of 46 bimekizumab-treated participants (4%), 2 of 21 placebo-treated participants (10%), and 1 of 21 adalimumab-treated participants (5%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this phase 2 randomized clinical trial, bimekizumab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements across all outcome measures, including stringent outcomes. Bimekizumab's safety profile was consistent with studies of other indications, supporting further evaluation in participants with HS.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03248531.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.