ArticleArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology2021
Large-Scale Screening for Monogenic and Clinically Defined Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Iceland.
Article in Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving the clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia among patients attending diabetes and cardiology clinics.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Familial hypercholesterolemia in Chinese children and adolescents: a multicenter study.Lipids in health and disease · 2024Article
- Familial Hypercholesterolemia Detection Through Machine Learning Algorithms: A Low-Hanging Fruit.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Reproductive Carrier Screening: Identifying Families at Risk for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the United States.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2024Review
- Observational
- Evaluation of miRNA-27a/b expression in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2024Article
- Genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia in a Finnish cohort of patients with premature coronary artery disease and elevated LDL-C levels.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Yield of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genetic and Phenotypic Diagnoses After Electronic Health Record and Genomic Data Screening.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Genomic Innovation in Early Life Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Treatment.Circulation research · 2023Review
- The Role of Registers in Increasing Knowledge and Improving Management of Children and Adolescents Affected by Familial Hypercholesterolemia: the LIPIGEN Pediatric Group.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- A mixed methods study of the awareness and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia in Irish general practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
31 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is traditionally defined as a monogenic disease characterized by severely elevated LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) levels. In practice, FH is commonly a clinical diagnosis without confirmation of a causative mutation. In this study, we sought to characterize and compare monogenic and clinically defined FH in a large sample of Icelanders. Approach and Results: We whole-genome sequenced 49 962 Icelanders and imputed the identified variants into an overall sample of 166 281 chip-genotyped Icelanders. We identified 20 FH mutations in LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9 with combined prevalence of 1 in 836. Monogenic FH was associated with severely elevated LDL-C levels and increased risk of premature coronary disease, aortic valve stenosis, and high burden of coronary atherosclerosis. We used a modified version of the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria to screen for the clinical FH phenotype among living adult participants (N=79 058). Clinical FH was found in 2.2% of participants, of whom only 5.2% had monogenic FH. Mutation-negative clinical FH has a strong polygenic basis. Both individuals with monogenic FH and individuals with mutation-negative clinical FH were markedly undertreated with cholesterol-lowering medications and only a minority attained an LDL-C target of <2.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL; 11.0% and 24.9%, respectively) or <1.8 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL; 0.0% and 5.2%, respectively), as recommended for primary prevention by European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society cholesterol guidelines. Conclusions: Clinically defined FH is a relatively common phenotype that is explained by monogenic FH in only a minority of cases. Both monogenic and clinical FH confer high cardiovascular risk but are markedly undertreated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.