ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2021
Schizophrenia vs. encephalitis: A neuropsychological case study.
Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From presenting with flu-like symptoms, seizures, and erratic behaviour including hallucinations, to being dismissed as "partying too much" and misdiagnosed with schizophrenia before the ultimate provision of a neurological explanation - encephalitis; this was a true sequence of events for the 24 year old female, Susannah Cahalan, who suddenly became ill with a mysterious illness that was misdiagnosed even after extensive evaluation until a neurologist was able to diagnose and effectively treat her (Cahalan, 2012; Barrett, 2016). Susannah's case bemused the medical field and became the plot of a book that subsequently garnered attention, large enough to be adapted into a movie, titled "Brain on Fire" (Barrett, 2016). Her case illustrated the exquisite interplay of neurology, physiology, and neuropsychology, complicated by personality traits and stereotypical behaviours observed in young adulthood, the period in which psychiatric illnesses also often begin to manifest. Unfortunately, while Susannah's case is rare, it is not unique. The following illustrates a case, similar to Susannah's, in which fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans, chronological history, and neuropsychological test results supported a diagnosis of encephalitis, while symptom presentation, response to treatment, and neurological consultation, suggested a diagnosis of schizophrenia, demonstrating a significant overlap in presentation of these two disorders and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment (APA, 2013; Lancaster, 2016). This case illustrates the complexity of the art and science of diagnostics during the developmental period, reminding us as professionals of the importance of thoroughly reviewing a patient's medical history and of the vital contributions each discipline can make when attempting to diagnose and treat complex presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.