Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34410512›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical systems2021

Machine Learning in Medical Emergencies: a Systematic Review and Analysis.

Inés Robles Mendo, Gonçalo Marques, Isabel de la Torre Díez, Miguel López-Coronado, Francisco Martín-Rodríguez

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inés Robles MendoDepartment of Signal Theory and Communications and Telematics Engineering, University of Valladolid, Paseo de Belén, 15, 47.011, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-6044
Gonçalo MarquesDepartment of Signal Theory and Communications and Telematics Engineering, University of Valladolid, Paseo de Belén, 15, 47.011, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-6571
Isabel de la Torre DíezDepartment of Signal Theory and Communications and Telematics Engineering, University of Valladolid, Paseo de Belén, 15, 47.011, Valladolid, Spain. isator@tel.uva.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3134-7720
Miguel López-CoronadoDepartment of Signal Theory and Communications and Telematics Engineering, University of Valladolid, Paseo de Belén, 15, 47.011, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1543-9732
Francisco Martín-RodríguezAdvanced Clinical Simulation Center. Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Avda. Ramón Y Cajal, 7, 47.005, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1773-2860

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the increasing demand for artificial intelligence research in medicine, the functionalities of his methods in health emergency remain unclear. Therefore, the authors have conducted this systematic review and a global overview study which aims to identify, analyse, and evaluate the research available on different platforms, and its implementations in healthcare emergencies. The methodology applied for the identification and selection of the scientific studies and the different applications consist of two methods. On the one hand, the PRISMA methodology was carried out in Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, PubMed ScienceDirect, and Scopus. On the other hand, a review of commercial applications found in the best-known commercial platforms (Android and iOS). A total of 20 studies were included in this review. Most of the included studies were of clinical decisions (n = 4, 20%) or medical services or emergency services (n = 4, 20%). Only 2 were focused on m-health (n = 2, 10%). On the other hand, 12 apps were chosen for full testing on different devices. These apps dealt with pre-hospital medical care (n = 3, 25%) or clinical decision support (n = 3, 25%). In total, half of these apps are based on machine learning based on natural language processing. Machine learning is increasingly applicable to healthcare and offers solutions to improve the efficiency and quality of healthcare. With the emergence of mobile health devices and applications that can use data and assess a patient's real-time health, machine learning is a growing trend in the healthcare industry.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalMobile ApplicationsTelemedicineArtificial IntelligenceEmergenciesHumansMachine LearningEmergency medicineHealth emergenciesMachine learningMobile applications

Identifiers

PMID34410512
PMCPMC8374032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.