Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34419699›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2021

Revisiting the BRCA-pathway through the lens of replication gap suppression: "Gaps determine therapy response in BRCA mutant cancer".

Sharon B Cantor

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sharon B CantorDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Cancer Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, LRB 415, 364 Plantation St., Worcester, MA 01605, USA. Electronic address: sharon.cantor@umassmed.edu.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Defining BRCA replication dysfunction in therapy responseR01CA254037 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CANTOR, SHARON B · 2020 to 2025
$2.6M
Targeting replication stress avoidance in cancerR01CA247232 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CANTOR, SHARON B · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA247232NCI NIH HHS R01 CA254037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The toxic lesion emanating from chemotherapy that targets the DNA was initially debated, but eventually the DNA double strand break (DSB) ultimately prevailed. The reasoning was in part based on the perception that repairing a fractured chromosome necessitated intricate processing or condemned the cell to death. Genetic evidence for the DSB model was also provided by the extreme sensitivity of cells that were deficient in DSB repair. In particular, sensitivity characterized cells harboring mutations in the hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes, BRCA1 or BRCA2, that function in the repair of DSBs by homologous recombination (HR). Along with functions in HR, BRCA proteins were found to prevent DSBs by protecting stalled replication forks from nuclease degradation. Coming full-circle, BRCA mutant cancer cells that gained resistance to genotoxic chemotherapy often displayed restored DNA repair by HR and/or restored fork protection (FP) implicating that the therapy was tolerated when DSB repair was intact or DSBs were prevented. Despite this well-supported paradigm that has been the impetus for targeted cancer therapy, here we argue that the toxic DNA lesion conferring response is instead single stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps. We discuss the evidence that persistent ssDNA gaps formed in the wake of DNA replication rather than DSBs are responsible for cell killing following treatment with genotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. We also highlight that proteins, such as BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51 known for canonical DSB repair also have critical roles in normal replication as well as replication gap suppression (RGS) and repair. We review the literature that supports the idea that widespread gap induction proximal to treatment triggers apoptosis in a process that does not need or stem from DSB induction. Lastly, we discuss the clinical evidence for gaps and how to exploit them to enhance genotoxic chemotherapy response.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA ReplicationBreast NeoplasmsDNA RepairDNA, Single-StrandedFemaleHomologous RecombinationHumansMutationNeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanDNA, Single-StrandedBRCA-RAD51 pathwayFork protectionHomologous recombinationReplication gap suppressionReplication stressSingle stranded DNA

Identifiers

PMID34419699
PMCPMC9049047
OpenAlexW3193366344

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.