Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34421671›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

Chronic, Multi-Site Recordings Supported by Two Low-Cost, Stationary Probe Designs Optimized to Capture Either Single Unit or Local Field Potential Activity in Behaving Rats.

Miranda J Francoeur, Tianzhi Tang, Leila Fakhraei, Xuanyu Wu, Sidharth Hulyalkar, Jessica Cramer, Nathalie Buscher, Dhakshin R Ramanathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beta and High Gamma Oscillations in the Cortico-striatal Network Reflect Reward Certainty on a Probabilistic Reversal Learning Task.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Cortico-striatal beta oscillations as a reward-related signal.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miranda J FrancoeurMental Health Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States.
Tianzhi TangMental Health Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States.
Leila FakhraeiMental Health Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States.
Xuanyu WuMental Health Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States.
Sidharth HulyalkarMental Health Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States.
Jessica CramerMental Health Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States.
Nathalie BuscherMental Health Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States.
Dhakshin R RamanathanMental Health Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Fellowship on Biological Psychiatry and NeuroscienceT32MH018399 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Pei-an (Betty) Shih · 1986 to 2026
$7.3M
BLRD VA IK2 BX003308NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodent models of cognitive behavior have greatly contributed to our understanding of human neuropsychiatric disorders. However, to elucidate the neurobiological underpinnings of such disorders or impairments, animal models are more useful when paired with methods for measuring brain function in awake, behaving animals. Standard tools used for systems-neuroscience level investigations are not optimized for large-scale and high-throughput behavioral battery testing due to various factors including cost, time, poor longevity, and selective targeting limited to measuring only a few brain regions at a time. Here we describe two different "user-friendly" methods for building extracellular electrophysiological probes that can be used to measure either single units or local field potentials in rats performing cognitive tasks. Both probe designs leverage several readily available, yet affordable, commercial products to facilitate ease of production and offer maximum flexibility in terms of brain-target locations that can be scalable (32-64 channels) based on experimental needs. Our approach allows neural activity to be recorded simultaneously with behavior and compared between micro (single unit) and more macro (local field potentials) levels of brain activity in order to gain a better understanding of how local brain regions and their connected networks support cognitive functions in rats. We believe our novel probe designs make collecting electrophysiology data easier and will begin to fill the gap in knowledge between basic and clinical research.

Indexed as

electrophysiologyfield potentialsfixed arraymulti-site recordingsrodent modelssingle unit

Identifiers

PMID34421671
PMCPMC8374626

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.