Evidence mapPaperPMID 34422883Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2021

A Root in Synapsis and the Other One in the Gut Microbiome-Brain Axis: Are the Two Poles of Ketogenic Diet Enough to Challenge Glioblastoma?

Liliana Montella, Federica Sarno, Lucia Altucci, Valentina Cioffi, Luigi Sigona, Salvatore Di Colandrea, Stefano De Simone, Alfredo Marinelli, Bianca Arianna Facchini, Ferdinando De Vita and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Liliana MontellaMedical Oncology Complex Unit, "Santa Maria delle Grazie" Hospital, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Naples, Italy.
Federica SarnoPrecision Medicine Department, "Luigi Vanvitelli" University of Campania, Naples, Italy.
Lucia AltucciPrecision Medicine Department, "Luigi Vanvitelli" University of Campania, Naples, Italy.
Valentina CioffiNeurosurgery Operative Complex Unit, "Santa Maria delle Grazie" Hospital, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Naples, Italy.
Luigi SigonaNeurosurgery Operative Complex Unit, "Santa Maria delle Grazie" Hospital, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Naples, Italy.
Salvatore Di ColandreaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, "Santa Maria delle Grazie" Hospital, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Naples, Italy.
Stefano De SimoneMedical Oncology Complex Unit, "Santa Maria delle Grazie" Hospital, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Naples, Italy.
Alfredo MarinelliOperative Unit Neuroncology University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Bianca Arianna FacchiniDivision of Medical Oncology, Precision Medicine Department, "Luigi Vanvitelli" University of Campania, Naples, Italy.
Ferdinando De VitaDivision of Medical Oncology, Precision Medicine Department, "Luigi Vanvitelli" University of Campania, Naples, Italy.
Massimiliano BerrettaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Raffaele de FalcoNeurosurgery Operative Complex Unit, "Santa Maria delle Grazie" Hospital, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Naples, Italy.
Gaetano FacchiniMedical Oncology Complex Unit, "Santa Maria delle Grazie" Hospital, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Naples, Italy.
Ospedale Santa Maria · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most frequent and aggressive brain cancer in adults. While precision medicine in oncology has produced remarkable progress in several malignancies, treatment of glioblastoma has still limited available options and a dismal prognosis. After first-line treatment with surgery followed by radiochemotherapy based on the 2005 STUPP trial, no significant therapeutic advancements have been registered. While waiting that genomic characterization moves from a prognostic/predictive value into therapeutic applications, practical and easy-to-use approaches are eagerly awaited. Medical reports on the role of the ketogenic diet in adult neurological disorders and in glioblastoma suggest that nutritional interventions may condition outcomes and be associated with standard therapies. The acceptable macronutrient distribution of daily calories in a regular diet are 45-65% of daily calories from carbohydrates, 20-35% from fats, and 10-35% from protein. Basically, the ketogenic diet follows an approach based on low carbohydrates/high fat intake. In carbohydrates starvation, body energy derives from fat storage which is used to produce ketones and act as glucose surrogates. The ketogenic diet has several effects: metabolic interference with glucose and insulin and IGF-1 pathways, influence on neurotransmission, reduction of oxidative stress and inflammation, direct effect on gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms. Apart from these central effects working at the synapsis level, recent evidence also suggests a role for microbiome and gut-brain axis induced by a ketogenic diet. This review focuses on rationales supporting the ketogenic diet and clinical studies will be reported, looking at future possible perspectives.

Indexed as

glioblastomagut-brain axisketogenic dietmicrobiotawarburg effect

Identifiers

PMID34422883
PMCPMC8378133
OpenAlexW3189261955

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.