Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2021
Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a randomised, controlled, multinational, open-label meta-trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 10 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 210 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Prone Positioning Combined With High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus High-Flow Nasal Cannula in COVID-19 Induced Moderate to Severe ARDS
Awake Prone Positioning to Reduce Invasive VEntilation in COVID-19 Induced Acute Respiratory failurE
Evaluation of Prone Position in Conscious Patients on Nasal High-flow Oxygen Therapy for COVID-19 Disease Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Effectiveness of Prone Positioning Combined With High-flow Nasal Cannula for Patients With COVID-19 Induced ARDS
Randomized-controlled Trial of HFNC Alone vs HFNC and Awake Self-proning for Treatment of Severe COVID-19
Prone Positioning in Non-intubated Patients With Severe COVID-19: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Evaluation of Awake Prone Positioning Effectiveness in Moderate to Severe COVID-19
A Physiological Study to Assess the Effects of Awake Prone Positioning in Healthy Volunteers Under Different Respiratory Support: A Randomized Crossover Study
Efficacy of Timed Awake Prone and Repositioning in Patients With Covid-19-induced Hypoxic Respiratory Failure: a Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Non-ventilated Prone Positioning in the COVID-19 Population
Who cites it
210 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 386 citations in OpenAlex.
- Awake prone positioning reduces mortality, intubation, and hospital stay in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 6,164 patients.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of Prone Positioning in Non-ARDS Patients With Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The clinical respiratory journal · 2026Pooled it
- High-flow nasal oxygen in perioperative and critical care: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Guideline on positioning and early mobilisation in the critically ill by an expert panel.Intensive care medicine · 2024Guideline
- Prone positioning effect on tracheal intubation rate, mortality and oxygenation parameters in awake non-intubated severe COVID-19-induced respiratory failure: a review of reviews.European journal of medical research · 2024Pooled it
- Conscious prone positioning in nonintubated COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care science · 2024Pooled it
- Awake prone positioning for patients with COVID-19-related respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Awake prone position in COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Pooled it
- High flow nasal oxygen and awake prone positioning - Two allies against COVID-19: A systematic review.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy of awake prone positioning in patients with covid-19 related hypoxemic respiratory failure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of Awake Prone Positioning in non-Intubated COVID-19 Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Analytic review and meta-analysis of awake prone positioning in patients with Covid-19.Medicina intensiva · 2022Pooled it
- Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Evolution of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Emergency and Critical Care: Therapeutic Management before and during the Pandemic Situation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Pooled it
- Prone positioning for non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2022Pooled it
- Awake prone positioning for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
150 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAwake prone positioning has been reported to improve oxygenation for patients with COVID-19 in retrospective and observational studies, but whether it improves patient-centred outcomes is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of awake prone positioning to prevent intubation or death in patients with severe COVID-19 in a large-scale randomised trial.
methodsIn this prospective, a priori set up and defined, collaborative meta-trial of six randomised controlled open-label superiority trials, adults who required respiratory support with high-flow nasal cannula for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 were randomly assigned to awake prone positioning or standard care. Hospitals from six countries were involved: Canada, France, Ireland, Mexico, USA, Spain. Patients or their care providers were not masked to allocated treatment. The primary composite outcome was treatment failure, defined as the proportion of patients intubated or dying within 28 days of enrolment. The six trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04325906, NCT04347941, NCT04358939, NCT04395144, NCT04391140, and NCT04477655.
findingsBetween April 2, 2020 and Jan 26, 2021, 1126 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to awake prone positioning (n=567) or standard care (n=559). 1121 patients (excluding five who withdrew from the study) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Treatment failure occurred in 223 (40%) of 564 patients assigned to awake prone positioning and in 257 (46%) of 557 patients assigned to standard care (relative risk 0·86 [95% CI 0·75-0·98]). The hazard ratio (HR) for intubation was 0·75 (0·62-0·91), and the HR for mortality was 0·87 (0·68-1·11) with awake prone positioning compared with standard care within 28 days of enrolment. The incidence of prespecified adverse events was low and similar in both groups.
interpretationAwake prone positioning of patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 reduces the incidence of treatment failure and the need for intubation without any signal of harm. These results support routine awake prone positioning of patients with COVID-19 who require support with high-flow nasal cannula.
fundingOpen AI inc, Rice Foundation, Projet Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique Interrégional, Appel d'Offre 2020, Groupement Interrégional de Recherche Clinique et d'Innovation Grand Ouest, Association pour la Promotion à Tours de la Réanimation Médicale, Fond de dotation du CHRU de Tours, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.