ArticleHuman genetics2022
Predicting functional consequences of mutations using molecular interaction network features.
Article in Human genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network Clustering Approach Reveals Key Proteins and Biological Functions in the Response of Whiteleg Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) to Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Identification of novel genomic variants in diabetic nephropathy patients using whole-exome sequencing: a pilot investigation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Interface-guided phenotyping of coding variants in the transcription factor RUNX1.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Network-based prediction approach for cancer-specific driver missense mutations using a graph neural network.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- The permissive binding theory of cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Evaluating the relevance of sequence conservation in the prediction of pathogenic missense variants.Human genetics · 2022Article
- Publisher Correction: Predicting functional consequences of mutations using molecular interaction network features.Human genetics · 2022Article
- Predicting deleterious missense genetic variants via integrative supervised nonnegative matrix tri-factorization.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Variant interpretation remains a central challenge for precision medicine. Missense variants are particularly difficult to understand as they change only a single amino acid in a protein sequence yet can have large and varied effects on protein activity. Numerous tools have been developed to identify missense variants with putative disease consequences from protein sequence and structure. However, biological function arises through higher order interactions among proteins and molecules within cells. We therefore sought to capture information about the potential of missense mutations to perturb protein interaction networks by integrating protein structure and interaction data. We developed 16 network-based annotations for missense mutations that provide orthogonal information to features classically used to prioritize variants. We then evaluated them in the context of a proven machine-learning framework for variant effect prediction across multiple benchmark datasets to demonstrate their potential to improve variant classification. Interestingly, network features resulted in larger performance gains for classifying somatic mutations than for germline variants, possibly due to different constraints on what mutations are tolerated at the cellular versus organismal level. Our results suggest that modeling variant potential to perturb context-specific interactome networks is a fruitful strategy to advance in silico variant effect prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.