ArticleScientific reports2021
Na
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical profile and prognosis of brugada syndrome SCN5A variant carriers with negative sodium channel blocker challenge.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Cardiac Involvement in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1: Mechanisms, Clinical Perspectives, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with biallelicHeart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Heart Failure and Arrhythmias: Circadian and Epigenetic Interplay in Myocardial Electrophysiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Heart-on-a-Miniscope: A Miniaturized Solution for Electrophysiological Drug Screening in Cardiac Organoids.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) for modeling cardiac arrhythmias: strengths, challenges and potential solutions.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Biophysical properties of NaScientific reports · 2023Article
- Gene Modulation with CRISPR-based Tools in Human iPSC-Cardiomyocytes.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2023Review
- Electrophysiological basis of cardiac arrhythmia in a mouse model of myotonic dystrophy type 1.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Cardiac involvement in patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells of myotonic dystrophy type 1: unveiling the impact of voltage-gated sodium channels.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Genetics of congenital arrhythmia syndromes: the challenge of variant interpretation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022Review
- Translational potential of hiPSCs in predictive modeling of heart development and disease.Birth defects research · 2022Review
- Basic Research Approaches to Evaluate Cardiac Arrhythmia in Heart Failure and Beyond.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Deciphering Common Long QT Syndrome Using CRISPR/Cas9 in Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiomyocytes derived from patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-CMs) successfully reproduce the mechanisms of several channelopathies. However, this approach involve cell reprogramming from somatic tissue biopsies or genomic editing in healthy iPSCs for every mutation found and to be investigated. We aim to knockout (KO) Na
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.