Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34434652›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

IdentPMP: identification of moonlighting proteins in plants using sequence-based learning models.

Xinyi Liu, Yueyue Shen, Youhua Zhang, Fei Liu, Zhiyu Ma, Zhenyu Yue, Yi Yue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictive modeling of moonlighting DNA-binding proteins.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinyi Liu *School of Information and Computer, Anhui Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Beidou Precision Agriculture Information, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yueyue Shen *School of Information and Computer, Anhui Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Beidou Precision Agriculture Information, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Youhua ZhangSchool of Information and Computer, Anhui Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Beidou Precision Agriculture Information, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Fei LiuSchool of Information and Computer, Anhui Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Beidou Precision Agriculture Information, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Zhiyu MaSchool of Information and Computer, Anhui Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Beidou Precision Agriculture Information, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Zhenyu YueSchool of Information and Computer, Anhui Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Beidou Precision Agriculture Information, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yi YueSchool of Information and Computer, Anhui Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Beidou Precision Agriculture Information, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Anhui Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA moonlighting protein refers to a protein that can perform two or more functions. Since the current moonlighting protein prediction tools mainly focus on the proteins in animals and microorganisms, and there are differences in the cells and proteins between animals and plants, these may cause the existing tools to predict plant moonlighting proteins inaccurately. Hence, the availability of a benchmark data set and a prediction tool specific for plant moonlighting protein are necessary.

methodsThis study used some protein feature classes from the data set constructed in house to develop a web-based prediction tool. In the beginning, we built a data set about plant protein and reduced redundant sequences. We then performed feature selection, feature normalization and feature dimensionality reduction on the training data. Next, machine learning methods for preliminary modeling were used to select feature classes that performed best in plant moonlighting protein prediction. This selected feature was incorporated into the final plant protein prediction tool. After that, we compared five machine learning methods and used grid searching to optimize parameters, and the most suitable method was chosen as the final model.

resultsThe prediction results indicated that the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) performed best, which was used as the algorithm to construct the prediction tool, called IdentPMP (Identification of Plant Moonlighting Proteins). The results of the independent test set shows that the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of IdentPMP is 0.43 and 0.68, which are 19.44% (0.43 vs. 0.36) and 13.33% (0.68 vs. 0.60) higher than state-of-the-art non-plant specific methods, respectively. This further demonstrated that a benchmark data set and a plant-specific prediction tool was required for plant moonlighting protein studies. Finally, we implemented the tool into a web version, and users can use it freely through the URL: http://identpmp.aielab.net/.

Indexed as

Benchmark data seteXtreme gradient boostingPlant moonlighting proteinPrediction tool

Identifiers

PMID34434652
PMCPMC8351581
OpenAlexW3189699109

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.