Evidence mapPaperPMID 34438839Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Effect of Environmental Complexity and Stocking Density on Fear and Anxiety in Broiler Chickens.

Mallory G Anderson, Andrew M Campbell, Andrew Crump, Gareth Arnott, Ruth C Newberry, Leonie Jacobs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Welfare assessment of turkeys (EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Welfare of broilers on farm.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mallory G AndersonDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Andrew M CampbellDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Andrew CrumpCentre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4485-5740
Gareth ArnottSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5DL, UK.
Ruth C NewberryDepartment of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5238-6959
Leonie JacobsDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3799-5078
Virginia Tech · USLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

Poultry Science Association Arthur W. Perdue Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barren housing and high stocking densities may contribute to negative affective states in broiler chickens, reducing their welfare. We investigated the effects of environmental complexity and stocking density on broilers' attention bias (measure of anxiety) and tonic immobility (measure of fear). In Experiment 1, individual birds were tested for attention bias (

Indexed as

affective stateanimal welfareanxietyattention biasbroiler chickenenvironmental complexityfearstocking densitytonic immobility

Identifiers

PMID34438839
PMCPMC8388751
OpenAlexW3187953437

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.