Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444844›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

A Graded Approach for Evaluating Health Claims about Plant-Based Food Supplements: Application of a Case Study Methodology.

Hélène Chevallier, Florent Herpin, Hélène Kergosien, Gabrielle Ventura, François-André Allaert

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hélène ChevallierBiofortis, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6640-4281
Florent HerpinCEN Nutriment, 21000 Dijon, France.
Hélène KergosienSynadiet, 75009 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4851-5815
Gabrielle VenturaSynadiet, 75009 Paris, France.
François-André AllaertCEN Nutriment, 21000 Dijon, France.
Institut Génétique Nantes Atlantique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of REGULATION (EC) No 1924/2006 has led to the formation of a list of health claims that can be used in food supplements (EU 432/2012). However, such supplements are often composed of plant preparations with claims omitted from this list. The peculiarity of plants is related to their long history of use, that could allow claims based on traditionally recognized health effects. In addition, the scientific literature has been enriched over the years through clinical studies that have assessed the bioavailability and efficacy of bioactive components, and investigated their mechanisms of action. Based on existing recognized models which aim to classify research according to the level of scientific evidence, Synadiet developed a three-grade model (A, B or C) for assessing plants health claims. In this paper, the applicability of the model is illustrated through an example for which a Grade B health claim attesting the possible contribution of red clover isoflavones to the improvement of blood lipid levels in postmenopausal women has been attributed. The model appears able to be easily extrapolated to claims pertaining to other plants. If adopted by consensus at European level, this model could initiate the implementation of a positive list of health claims on plant preparations.

Indexed as

Plants, EdibleAdultAgedDietary SupplementsFemaleFood AnalysisFood LabelingHumansIsoflavonesLegislation, FoodLipidsMaleMiddle AgedNutritive ValuePlant PreparationsPostmenopauseIsoflavonesLipidsPlant Preparationsfood supplementhealth claimnutrition regulation

Identifiers

PMID34444844
PMCPMC8399096
OpenAlexW3191817512

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.